Tools & Wizards About Us
maloneprocess.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 31

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    51% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

maloneprocess.com

MPS

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

100 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

257 ms

maloneprocess.com screenshot

About Website

Visit maloneprocess.com now to see the best up-to-date Maloneprocess content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about maloneprocess.com

Visit maloneprocess.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Maloneprocess.com page load time and found that the first response time was 100 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

maloneprocess.com performance score

31

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

46/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.6 s

17/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value940 ms

29/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.015

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.7 s

14/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.maloneprocess.com

100 ms

css2

74 ms

legacy.js

65 ms

modern.js

72 ms

extract-css-runtime-a6767ed8372f9c55495e-min.en-US.js

66 ms

Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Maloneprocess.com, 39% (12 requests) were made to Images.squarespace-cdn.com and 29% (9 requests) were made to Assets.squarespace.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Images.squarespace-cdn.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 419.4 kB (12%)

Content Size

3.5 MB

After Optimization

3.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Maloneprocess.com main page is 3.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 171.9 kB

  • Original 195.7 kB
  • After minification 164.2 kB
  • After compression 23.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 31.5 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 171.9 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 165.9 kB

  • Original 2.2 MB
  • After minification 2.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Maloneprocess images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 81.6 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB
  • After compression 1.0 MB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 78 B

  • Original 9.9 kB
  • After minification 9.9 kB
  • After compression 9.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Maloneprocess.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (77%)

Requests Now

30

After Optimization

7

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Maloneprocess. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.maloneprocess.com

www.maloneprocess.com

100 ms

css2

css2

74 ms

legacy.js

legacy.js

65 ms

modern.js

modern.js

72 ms

extract-css-runtime-a6767ed8372f9c55495e-min.en-US.js

extract-css-runtime-a6767ed8372f9c55495e-min.en-US.js

66 ms

extract-css-moment-js-vendor-675f9459672cf966ca51-min.en-US.js

extract-css-moment-js-vendor-675f9459672cf966ca51-min.en-US.js

231 ms

cldr-resource-pack-a682f7ad337741eb05d6-min.en-US.js

cldr-resource-pack-a682f7ad337741eb05d6-min.en-US.js

67 ms

common-vendors-stable-f9df4447a2af25df5875-min.en-US.js

common-vendors-stable-f9df4447a2af25df5875-min.en-US.js

79 ms

common-vendors-e3dba6f4bd49760d9a75-min.en-US.js

common-vendors-e3dba6f4bd49760d9a75-min.en-US.js

86 ms

common-99884444cf908a1fb534-min.en-US.js

common-99884444cf908a1fb534-min.en-US.js

280 ms

performance-595641e15dc2776e5ea1-min.en-US.js

performance-595641e15dc2776e5ea1-min.en-US.js

70 ms

site.css

site.css

94 ms

js

js

376 ms

static.css

static.css

68 ms

site-bundle.50b4de10587967c63a6c38385a95664b.js

site-bundle.50b4de10587967c63a6c38385a95664b.js

45 ms

360%2B+5-Star+Reviews+%283%29.png

360%2B+5-Star+Reviews+%283%29.png

889 ms

dreamstime_xxl_178099615.jpg

dreamstime_xxl_178099615.jpg

839 ms

CalebMalone%40gmail.com++877-99-SERVE.+%28214%29+500-9851

CalebMalone%40gmail.com++877-99-SERVE.+%28214%29+500-9851

632 ms

unsplash-image-T41c_r3CVOs.jpg

unsplash-image-T41c_r3CVOs.jpg

744 ms

unsplash-image-Kab_-4M4I74.jpg

unsplash-image-Kab_-4M4I74.jpg

788 ms

unsplash-image-JFfDRKlI3hY.jpg

unsplash-image-JFfDRKlI3hY.jpg

796 ms

istockphoto-680820172-612x612.jpg

istockphoto-680820172-612x612.jpg

1011 ms

AustinTX.jpg

AustinTX.jpg

1194 ms

houst.jpeg

houst.jpeg

1155 ms

sann.jpeg

sann.jpeg

1318 ms

tpsa.png

tpsa.png

1233 ms

NAPPS2.png

NAPPS2.png

1341 ms

js

js

62 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

20 ms

collect

collect

18 ms

collect

collect

5 ms

Accessibility Review

maloneprocess.com accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

maloneprocess.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

maloneprocess.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Maloneprocess.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Maloneprocess.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

maloneprocess.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Maloneprocess. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: