Tools & Wizards About Us
mamjo.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 47

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    66% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 72% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

Page Load Speed

1 sec in total

First Response

177 ms

Resources Loaded

739 ms

Page Rendered

109 ms

mamjo.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Mamjo content for Suriname. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about mamjo.com

Visit mamjo.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Mamjo.com page load time and found that the first response time was 177 ms and then it took 848 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

mamjo.com performance score

47

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

23/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

45/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.0 s

81/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,140 ms

22/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.079

94/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.3 s

49/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

mamjo.com

177 ms

logo.jpg

284 ms

partnervideo.jpg

559 ms

Our browser made a total of 3 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Mamjo.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (559 ms) belongs to the original domain Mamjo.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 15.0 kB (8%)

Content Size

176.8 kB

After Optimization

161.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Mamjo.com main page is 176.8 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 176.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-52%

Potential reduce by 401 B

  • Original 776 B
  • After minification 770 B
  • After compression 375 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 401 B or 52% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 14.6 kB

  • Original 176.0 kB
  • After minification 161.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mamjo images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

2

After Optimization

2

  • Images

The browser has sent 2 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mamjo. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

mamjo.com

mamjo.com

177 ms

logo.jpg

logo.jpg

284 ms

partnervideo.jpg

partnervideo.jpg

559 ms

Accessibility Review

mamjo.com accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

mamjo.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

mamjo.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    NL

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mamjo.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Dutch is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Mamjo.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

mamjo.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Mamjo. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: