Tools & Wizards About Us
mammoth-jp.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 50

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    68% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

mammoth-jp.com

MAMMOTH INC.

Page Load Speed

2.8 sec in total

First Response

530 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

106 ms

mammoth-jp.com screenshot

About Website

Visit mammoth-jp.com now to see the best up-to-date MAMMOTH Jp content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about mammoth-jp.com

株式会社マンモス

Visit mammoth-jp.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Mammoth-jp.com page load time and found that the first response time was 530 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

mammoth-jp.com performance score

50

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.0 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.2 s

11/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.4 s

12/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value210 ms

88/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.1 s

41/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

mammoth-jp.com

530 ms

style.css

173 ms

_else.css

333 ms

style.css

333 ms

index.css

342 ms

Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Mammoth-jp.com, 3% (1 request) were made to Google.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Maps.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (530 ms) belongs to the original domain Mammoth-jp.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 27.0 kB (21%)

Content Size

130.8 kB

After Optimization

103.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Mammoth-jp.com main page is 130.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 78.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 6.9 kB

  • Original 8.8 kB
  • After minification 8.7 kB
  • After compression 1.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 6.9 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 4.3 kB
  • After minification 4.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. MAMMOTH Jp images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 15.9 kB

  • Original 78.3 kB
  • After minification 78.0 kB
  • After compression 62.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 15.9 kB or 20% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 4.2 kB

  • Original 39.4 kB
  • After minification 39.2 kB
  • After compression 35.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mammoth-jp.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.2 kB or 11% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (89%)

Requests Now

37

After Optimization

4

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of MAMMOTH Jp. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

mammoth-jp.com

mammoth-jp.com

530 ms

style.css

style.css

173 ms

_else.css

_else.css

333 ms

style.css

style.css

333 ms

index.css

index.css

342 ms

script.js

script.js

344 ms

common.css

common.css

183 ms

pagelayout.css

pagelayout.css

327 ms

printlayout.css

printlayout.css

335 ms

blockskin.css

blockskin.css

340 ms

wp_style.css

wp_style.css

181 ms

overwrite.css

overwrite.css

183 ms

style.css

style.css

191 ms

theme.css

theme.css

180 ms

legacy.css

legacy.css

172 ms

jquery-1.8.3.min.js

jquery-1.8.3.min.js

359 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.js

jquery.easing.1.3.js

167 ms

head.load.min.js

head.load.min.js

174 ms

movie.js

movie.js

168 ms

parts.js

parts.js

167 ms

fx.js

fx.js

337 ms

override.js

override.js

335 ms

load.js

load.js

334 ms

embed

embed

196 ms

_area_header.css

_area_header.css

172 ms

_area_billboard.css

_area_billboard.css

176 ms

_area_main.css

_area_main.css

168 ms

_area_side_a.css

_area_side_a.css

176 ms

_area_side_b.css

_area_side_b.css

170 ms

_area_footer.css

_area_footer.css

167 ms

_block_header.css

_block_header.css

337 ms

_block_billboard.css

_block_billboard.css

337 ms

_block_main.css

_block_main.css

338 ms

_block_side_a.css

_block_side_a.css

340 ms

_block_side_b.css

_block_side_b.css

343 ms

_block_footer.css

_block_footer.css

352 ms

mlogo960.png

mlogo960.png

499 ms

js

js

45 ms

Accessibility Review

mammoth-jp.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

mammoth-jp.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

mammoth-jp.com SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    JA

  • Language Claimed

    JA

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mammoth-jp.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mammoth-jp.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

mammoth-jp.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of MAMMOTH Jp. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: