9.4 sec in total
2.7 sec
5.6 sec
1.2 sec
Welcome to mamna.net homepage info - get ready to check Mamna best content right away, or after learning these important things about mamna.net
صحيفة وادي ممنا
Visit mamna.netWe analyzed Mamna.net page load time and found that the first response time was 2.7 sec and then it took 6.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
mamna.net performance score
2676 ms
99 ms
90 ms
93 ms
98 ms
Our browser made a total of 84 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 50% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Mamna.net, 14% (12 requests) were made to I0.wp.com and 12% (10 requests) were made to I1.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Mamna.net.
Page size can be reduced by 701.5 kB (52%)
1.4 MB
653.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Mamna.net main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 464.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 120.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 120.0 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mamna images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 311.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 311.3 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 262.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mamna.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 262.7 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (49%)
81
41
The browser has sent 81 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mamna. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.mamna.net
2676 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
99 ms
jquery-ui-1.10.3.custom.css
90 ms
jquery-ui-spinner.css
93 ms
calendar-jos.css
98 ms
form_maker_frontend.css
99 ms
jquery.galleryview-3.0-dev-responsive.css
98 ms
style.css
177 ms
css
29 ms
jetpack-rtl.css
139 ms
jquery.js
219 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
144 ms
js
49 ms
if_gmap_front_end.js
145 ms
jelly.min.js
186 ms
file-upload.js
186 ms
calendar.js
190 ms
calendar_function.js
192 ms
jquery.timers-1.2.js
261 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
264 ms
jquery.gview-3.0-dev-responsive.js
265 ms
rtl.css
268 ms
photon.js
283 ms
widget.min.js
306 ms
core.min.js
307 ms
mouse.min.js
307 ms
slider.min.js
307 ms
button.min.js
307 ms
spinner.min.js
308 ms
effect.min.js
308 ms
effect-shake.min.js
308 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
8 ms
gprofiles.js
64 ms
wpgroho.js
324 ms
tie-scripts.js
349 ms
wp-embed.min.js
324 ms
e-201611.js
7 ms
SDC12120.jpg
1007 ms
10403334_982694481799413_6744435579810299368_n.jpg
726 ms
hgjghjghj.gif
722 ms
1.jpg
298 ms
BxjNK1bCEAANVCJ.jpg
988 ms
SDC12120.jpg
718 ms
1.jpg
990 ms
CY0wcE8UsAAb7w1.jpg-large.jpg
715 ms
12507572_1511854835777314_1926502412925015628_n.jpg
723 ms
12507572_1511854835777314_1926502412925015628_n.jpg
735 ms
SDC12120.jpg
864 ms
1.jpg
1040 ms
body-bg18.png
98 ms
top-shadow.png
88 ms
logo11.png
80 ms
%D8%B5%D8%AD%D9%8A%D9%81%D8%A9-%D9%88%D8%A7%D8%AF%D9%8A-%D9%85%D9%85%D9%86%D8%A7.jpg
126 ms
black-loader.gif
90 ms
222.png
125 ms
IMG-20160223-WA0011.jpg
716 ms
arton2693.jpg
205 ms
15096.imgcache.jpg
992 ms
5.jpg
718 ms
arton2693.jpg
276 ms
IMG-20160220-WA0002.jpg
710 ms
%D9%A2%D9%A0%D9%A1%D9%A5%D9%A0%D9%A6%D9%A1%D9%A3_%D9%A1%D9%A6%D9%A3%D9%A8%D9%A3%D9%A3-2.jpg
719 ms
IMG-20160112-WA0010.jpg
964 ms
arton2693.jpg
718 ms
IMG-20160112-WA0010.jpg
1020 ms
15096.imgcache.jpg
1274 ms
IMG-20160203-WA0005.jpg
713 ms
1.jpg
706 ms
CSejzlmWsAE9wXB.jpg
713 ms
IMG_3851.jpg
1232 ms
5.jpg
713 ms
5.jpg
1028 ms
hgjghjghj.gif
773 ms
tiefontello.svg
167 ms
tiefontello.woff
97 ms
ge-ss-med.ttf
166 ms
sidebar-bullet.png
367 ms
hovercard.css
47 ms
services.css
57 ms
g.gif
51 ms
all.js
159 ms
plusone.js
49 ms
widgets.js
137 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
3 ms
mamna.net SEO score
N/A
AR
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mamna.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is Arabic. Our system also found out that Mamna.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
mamna.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Mamna. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: