Report Summary

  • 32

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    52% of other websites

  • 65

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 30% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

mandap.com

Mandap - Find Best Wedding Venues, Banquet Halls, Wedding Halls

Page Load Speed

6.2 sec in total

First Response

944 ms

Resources Loaded

3.9 sec

Page Rendered

1.4 sec

mandap.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Mandap content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about mandap.com

Browse 40000+ Top Rated Venues With Review, Price, Menu and Availability. Get best deals on venues for your wedding, birthday party, corporate events and other functions.

Visit mandap.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Mandap.com page load time and found that the first response time was 944 ms and then it took 5.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

mandap.com performance score

32

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

21/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.1 s

12/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.4 s

40/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,210 ms

20/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.4 s

19/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.mandap.com

944 ms

gtm.js

175 ms

jquery.min-43705692dfe02d96d4b30e3d9bbaacf26b7c57e7ec0ccda2820c444e62c82837.js

97 ms

bootstrap.min.css

30 ms

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

33 ms

Our browser made a total of 128 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (94 requests) were addressed to the original Mandap.com, 8% (10 requests) were made to Img.weddingbazaar.com and 8% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) relates to the external source Img.weddingbazaar.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 507.9 kB (15%)

Content Size

3.4 MB

After Optimization

2.9 MB

In fact, the total size of Mandap.com main page is 3.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 426.6 kB

  • Original 494.7 kB
  • After minification 407.6 kB
  • After compression 68.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 87.0 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 426.6 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 24.1 kB

  • Original 2.7 MB
  • After minification 2.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mandap images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 10.9 kB

  • Original 129.6 kB
  • After minification 129.6 kB
  • After compression 118.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-56%

Potential reduce by 46.3 kB

  • Original 82.3 kB
  • After minification 81.6 kB
  • After compression 36.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mandap.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 46.3 kB or 56% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (35%)

Requests Now

116

After Optimization

75

The browser has sent 116 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mandap. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

mandap.com accessibility score

65

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

Low

No form fields have multiple labels

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

mandap.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

mandap.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mandap.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mandap.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Mandap. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: