5.5 sec in total
1 sec
3.9 sec
607 ms
Click here to check amazing MANT content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about mant.pl
Od 2008 roku specjalizujemy się w marketingu internetowym - pozycjonowaniu, social mediach i tworzeniu stron www. Dołącz do zadowolonych Klientów! Tel: (32) 442 00 07.
Visit mant.plWe analyzed Mant.pl page load time and found that the first response time was 1 sec and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
mant.pl performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
24/100
10%
Value5.4 s
20/100
25%
Value6.1 s
45/100
10%
Value100 ms
98/100
30%
Value0.027
100/100
15%
Value6.2 s
62/100
10%
1016 ms
201 ms
317 ms
339 ms
449 ms
Our browser made a total of 88 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (72 requests) were addressed to the original Mant.pl, 16% (14 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Mant.pl.
Page size can be reduced by 118.3 kB (4%)
2.7 MB
2.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Mant.pl main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 82.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 20.3 kB, which is 21% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 82.6 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 32.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. MANT images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 2.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mant.pl has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (68%)
71
23
The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of MANT. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
mant.pl
1016 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
201 ms
style.min.css
317 ms
styles.css
339 ms
bootstrap.min.css
449 ms
fontawesome.min.css
344 ms
magnific-popup.min.css
346 ms
odometer-theme-default.min.css
346 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
429 ms
style.min.css
567 ms
style.css
458 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
462 ms
frontend-legacy.min.css
461 ms
frontend.min.css
547 ms
post-2839.css
558 ms
global.css
573 ms
post-55.css
578 ms
widgets.css
576 ms
nextgen_basic_thumbnails.css
659 ms
ngg_basic_slideshow.css
669 ms
css
34 ms
css
53 ms
jquery.min.js
685 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
696 ms
style.css
637 ms
animations.min.css
638 ms
front-end-widget.js
712 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
712 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
717 ms
index.js
725 ms
popper.min.js
726 ms
bootstrap.min.js
843 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
815 ms
isInViewport.jquery.min.js
815 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
828 ms
jquery.fitvids.min.js
834 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
852 ms
odometer.min.js
910 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
921 ms
scrolla.jquery.min.js
828 ms
main.min.js
720 ms
wp-embed.min.js
708 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
702 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
764 ms
waypoints.min.js
775 ms
core.min.js
712 ms
swiper.min.js
824 ms
share-link.min.js
706 ms
dialog.min.js
699 ms
frontend.min.js
763 ms
preloaded-modules.min.js
682 ms
logo-e1566565833858.png
531 ms
plansza-informacyjna-PFR-poziom.jpg
1367 ms
mtsmant.jpg
900 ms
w3-360x252.jpg
656 ms
Domix-360x252.jpeg
657 ms
Arcon-Technika-Grzewcza-360x252.jpeg
658 ms
w5.jpg
672 ms
Kancelaria-Cieplik-360x252.jpeg
725 ms
Re-Med-360x252.jpeg
734 ms
Katedra-Kryminologii-UJ-360x385.jpeg
747 ms
Poszwinski-360x385.jpeg
711 ms
Elektroprojekt-360x385.jpeg
759 ms
HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJN7Ml1RMC.woff
50 ms
HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJN7Ml2xMC.woff
27 ms
HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJBbMl1RMC.woff
49 ms
HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJBbMl2xMC.woff
50 ms
HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJabMl1RMC.woff
52 ms
HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJabMl2xMC.woff
51 ms
HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJt7Ml1RMC.woff
50 ms
HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJt7Ml2xMC.woff
52 ms
HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJ6bQl1RMC.woff
53 ms
HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJ6bQl2xMC.woff
53 ms
HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJ0LQl1RMC.woff
55 ms
HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJ0LQl2xMC.woff
53 ms
HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJt7Ql1RMC.woff
54 ms
HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJt7Ql2xMC.woff
55 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
986 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
783 ms
w4-360x385.jpg
819 ms
Komornik-Marcin-Gody%C5%84-360x252.jpeg
855 ms
Astra-Technology-360x490.jpeg
802 ms
w2-360x252.jpg
835 ms
Koban-360x252.jpeg
832 ms
w1-360x252.jpg
859 ms
Zdj%C4%99cie-17.03.2017-11-47-44-e1566817595553.jpg
1424 ms
hero-banner-25.jpg
594 ms
mant.pl
822 ms
mant.pl accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
mant.pl best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
mant.pl SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
PL
PL
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mant.pl can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Polish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mant.pl main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
mant.pl
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of MANT. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: