Report Summary

  • 34

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    54% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

manul.ru

Агрофирма «Манул»

Page Load Speed

9.6 sec in total

First Response

489 ms

Resources Loaded

7.5 sec

Page Rendered

1.6 sec

manul.ru screenshot

About Website

Visit manul.ru now to see the best up-to-date Manul content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about manul.ru

Visit manul.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Manul.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 489 ms and then it took 9.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

manul.ru performance score

34

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

10/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value50.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.1 s

21/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value650 ms

46/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.117

85/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.0 s

42/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

manul.ru

489 ms

manul.ru

1072 ms

cui-fgrid.css

39 ms

font-awesome.min.css

35 ms

magnific-popup.css

43 ms

Our browser made a total of 196 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (179 requests) were addressed to the original Manul.ru, 5% (10 requests) were made to Img.youtube.com and 2% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Manul.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 827.3 kB (4%)

Content Size

18.7 MB

After Optimization

17.9 MB

In fact, the total size of Manul.ru main page is 18.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 17.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 355.0 kB

  • Original 395.4 kB
  • After minification 350.4 kB
  • After compression 40.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 45.0 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 355.0 kB or 90% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 471.3 kB

  • Original 17.6 MB
  • After minification 17.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Manul images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 607 B

  • Original 247.8 kB
  • After minification 247.8 kB
  • After compression 247.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 392 B

  • Original 486.8 kB
  • After minification 486.8 kB
  • After compression 486.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Manul.ru has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (18%)

Requests Now

187

After Optimization

153

The browser has sent 187 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Manul. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

manul.ru accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

manul.ru best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

manul.ru SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Manul.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Manul.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Manul. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: