Tools & Wizards About Us
mappoint-replacement.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 91

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    91% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

mappoint-replacement.com

Mappoint Replacement - A list of alternative routing software options

Page Load Speed

732 ms in total

First Response

141 ms

Resources Loaded

385 ms

Page Rendered

206 ms

mappoint-replacement.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Mappoint Replacement content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about mappoint-replacement.com

Microsoft MapPoint discontinued their services at the end of 2014. Here is a list of the top routing software options to replace Mappoint.

Visit mappoint-replacement.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Mappoint-replacement.com page load time and found that the first response time was 141 ms and then it took 591 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

mappoint-replacement.com performance score

91

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.3 s

98/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

78/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.3 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value170 ms

93/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.9 s

89/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

mappoint-replacement.com

141 ms

js

65 ms

bootstrap.min.css

107 ms

jumbotron-narrow.css

116 ms

ie-emulation-modes-warning.js

118 ms

Our browser made a total of 16 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (10 requests) were addressed to the original Mappoint-replacement.com, 25% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 13% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (160 ms) belongs to the original domain Mappoint-replacement.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 6.5 kB (3%)

Content Size

208.9 kB

After Optimization

202.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Mappoint-replacement.com main page is 208.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 139.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 4.8 kB

  • Original 7.1 kB
  • After minification 6.0 kB
  • After compression 2.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.1 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 4.8 kB or 67% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

  • Original 139.3 kB
  • After minification 138.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mappoint Replacement images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 204 B

  • Original 42.4 kB
  • After minification 42.4 kB
  • After compression 42.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 326 B

  • Original 20.1 kB
  • After minification 20.1 kB
  • After compression 19.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mappoint-replacement.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (29%)

Requests Now

14

After Optimization

10

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 14 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mappoint Replacement. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

mappoint-replacement.com

mappoint-replacement.com

141 ms

js

js

65 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

107 ms

jumbotron-narrow.css

jumbotron-narrow.css

116 ms

ie-emulation-modes-warning.js

ie-emulation-modes-warning.js

118 ms

ie10-viewport-bug-workaround.js

ie10-viewport-bug-workaround.js

160 ms

js

js

67 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

21 ms

badger-maps-logo-slim.jpg

badger-maps-logo-slim.jpg

87 ms

pitney-bowes-logo-slim.jpg

pitney-bowes-logo-slim.jpg

88 ms

XactlyAlignstar-resized.jpg

XactlyAlignstar-resized.jpg

123 ms

espatial-logo-slim.jpg

espatial-logo-slim.jpg

87 ms

batchgeo-logo-slim.jpg

batchgeo-logo-slim.jpg

105 ms

collect

collect

46 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

44 ms

collect

collect

50 ms

Accessibility Review

mappoint-replacement.com accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

mappoint-replacement.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

mappoint-replacement.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mappoint-replacement.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mappoint-replacement.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

mappoint-replacement.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Mappoint Replacement. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: