Tools & Wizards About Us
marblepolishing.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 93

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    92% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 54

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    19% of websites

marblepolishing.in

ARN MARBLE POLISHING, Hyderabad, Best Marble polishing Works in Hyderabad

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

161 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

195 ms

marblepolishing.in screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing MARBLE POLISHING content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about marblepolishing.in

ARN MARBLE POLISHING, Hyderabad is the Best Marble polishing service providers in Hyderabad for New Building and old renovation buildings for marble polishing, quality Marble polishing

Visit marblepolishing.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Marblepolishing.in page load time and found that the first response time was 161 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

marblepolishing.in performance score

93

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.1 s

99/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.1 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.1 s

92/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value210 ms

88/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.5 s

71/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

marblepolishing.in

161 ms

css

43 ms

bootstrap.min.css

111 ms

swiper.min.css

121 ms

magnific-popup.min.css

139 ms

Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (52 requests) were addressed to the original Marblepolishing.in, 13% (8 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Npmcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (863 ms) belongs to the original domain Marblepolishing.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 73.3 kB (46%)

Content Size

159.2 kB

After Optimization

86.0 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Marblepolishing.in main page is 159.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 110.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 37.8 kB

  • Original 47.1 kB
  • After minification 38.3 kB
  • After compression 9.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.7 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 37.8 kB or 80% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-31%

Potential reduce by 34.7 kB

  • Original 110.1 kB
  • After minification 110.0 kB
  • After compression 75.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 34.7 kB or 31% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-36%

Potential reduce by 729 B

  • Original 2.0 kB
  • After minification 2.0 kB
  • After compression 1.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Marblepolishing.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 729 B or 36% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (25%)

Requests Now

61

After Optimization

46

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of MARBLE POLISHING. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

marblepolishing.in

marblepolishing.in

161 ms

css

css

43 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

111 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

121 ms

magnific-popup.min.css

magnific-popup.min.css

139 ms

style.css

style.css

116 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

147 ms

theme-color-1.css

theme-color-1.css

121 ms

custom.css

custom.css

194 ms

style.css

style.css

200 ms

lightbox.min.css

lightbox.min.css

59 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

200 ms

owl.theme.css

owl.theme.css

202 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

151 ms

owl.theme.default.min.css

owl.theme.default.min.css

158 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

189 ms

owl.carousel.js

owl.carousel.js

210 ms

jquery-3.2.1.min.js

jquery-3.2.1.min.js

274 ms

fontawesome-all.min.js

fontawesome-all.min.js

290 ms

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

287 ms

typed.min.js

typed.min.js

321 ms

jquery.waypoints.min.js

jquery.waypoints.min.js

320 ms

sticky.min.js

sticky.min.js

320 ms

particles.min.js

particles.min.js

325 ms

particles.settings.js

particles.settings.js

323 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

354 ms

parsley.min.js

parsley.min.js

376 ms

parallax.min.js

parallax.min.js

370 ms

retina.min.js

retina.min.js

364 ms

menu.min.js

menu.min.js

343 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

343 ms

custom.js

custom.js

360 ms

flickity.pkgd.js

flickity.pkgd.js

78 ms

script.js

script.js

360 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

44 ms

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

44 ms

lightbox.min.js

lightbox.min.js

56 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

443 ms

flickity.pkgd.js

flickity.pkgd.js

13 ms

close.png

close.png

75 ms

logo.jpg

logo.jpg

206 ms

header3.jpg

header3.jpg

203 ms

header2.jpg

header2.jpg

195 ms

header1.jpg

header1.jpg

203 ms

serve1.jpg

serve1.jpg

211 ms

serve3.jpg

serve3.jpg

269 ms

serve7.jpg

serve7.jpg

264 ms

buildings.jpg

buildings.jpg

267 ms

serve5.jpg

serve5.jpg

266 ms

serve8.jpg

serve8.jpg

275 ms

pic-1.jpg

pic-1.jpg

719 ms

pic-2.jpg

pic-2.jpg

781 ms

pic-3.jpg

pic-3.jpg

776 ms

pic-4.jpg

pic-4.jpg

802 ms

pic-5.jpg

pic-5.jpg

774 ms

pic-6.jpg

pic-6.jpg

804 ms

pic-7.jpg

pic-7.jpg

810 ms

pic-8.jpg

pic-8.jpg

857 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

52 ms

prev.png

prev.png

53 ms

next.png

next.png

53 ms

pic-9.jpg

pic-9.jpg

863 ms

pic-10.jpg

pic-10.jpg

849 ms

Accessibility Review

marblepolishing.in accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

marblepolishing.in best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

marblepolishing.in SEO score

54

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Marblepolishing.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Marblepolishing.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

marblepolishing.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of MARBLE POLISHING. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: