Tools & Wizards About Us
marketingcomparison.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

marketingcomparison.com

Marketing Comparison – Your complete resource for Direct Mail Services – effective mailing campaign advice

Page Load Speed

398 ms in total

First Response

62 ms

Resources Loaded

146 ms

Page Rendered

190 ms

marketingcomparison.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to marketingcomparison.com homepage info - get ready to check Marketing Comparison best content right away, or after learning these important things about marketingcomparison.com

Compare free mail house quotes from leading suppliers and get free buying advice for direct mail marketing.

Visit marketingcomparison.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Marketingcomparison.com page load time and found that the first response time was 62 ms and then it took 336 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

marketingcomparison.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

marketingcomparison.com

62 ms

style.css

6 ms

ga.js

16 ms

bg.gif

44 ms

header.gif

47 ms

Our browser made a total of 21 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (19 requests) were addressed to the original Marketingcomparison.com, 10% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (62 ms) belongs to the original domain Marketingcomparison.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 51.8 kB (68%)

Content Size

75.8 kB

After Optimization

24.0 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Marketingcomparison.com main page is 75.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 46.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 11.3 kB

  • Original 16.4 kB
  • After minification 15.2 kB
  • After compression 5.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 11.3 kB or 69% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 29.1 kB

  • Original 46.3 kB
  • After minification 46.3 kB
  • After compression 17.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 29.1 kB or 63% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 11.3 kB

  • Original 13.2 kB
  • After minification 11.1 kB
  • After compression 1.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Marketingcomparison.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 11.3 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

20

After Optimization

20

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 20 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Marketing Comparison. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

marketingcomparison.com

marketingcomparison.com

62 ms

style.css

style.css

6 ms

ga.js

ga.js

16 ms

bg.gif

bg.gif

44 ms

header.gif

header.gif

47 ms

logo1.gif

logo1.gif

48 ms

body.gif

body.gif

46 ms

directnav.gif

directnav.gif

43 ms

brokernav.gif

brokernav.gif

44 ms

emailnav.gif

emailnav.gif

52 ms

promonav.gif

promonav.gif

48 ms

bg-quote3.gif

bg-quote3.gif

46 ms

btn.gif

btn.gif

48 ms

arrow_bullet.gif

arrow_bullet.gif

49 ms

grid_bg.gif

grid_bg.gif

49 ms

direct-types.gif

direct-types.gif

52 ms

direct-vendors.gif

direct-vendors.gif

50 ms

direct-costs.gif

direct-costs.gif

51 ms

footer.gif

footer.gif

52 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

16 ms

btn_on.gif

btn_on.gif

4 ms

SEO Factors

marketingcomparison.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Marketingcomparison.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Marketingcomparison.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

marketingcomparison.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Marketing Comparison. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: