Tools & Wizards About Us
marketingstudies.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 41

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    60% of other websites

  • 61

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 27% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

marketingstudies.net

RSS Marketing and Real-Life Marketing Experience

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

452 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

268 ms

marketingstudies.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to marketingstudies.net homepage info - get ready to check Marketing Studies best content right away, or after learning these important things about marketingstudies.net

RSS marketing and RSS publishing latest news, developments and advice, plus a look at the different marketing approach from real-life experience.

Visit marketingstudies.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Marketingstudies.net page load time and found that the first response time was 452 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

marketingstudies.net performance score

41

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

88/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.3 s

29/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value780 ms

37/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.007

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.6 s

29/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.marketingstudies.net

452 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

14 ms

css

38 ms

genericons.css

18 ms

style.css

19 ms

Our browser made a total of 18 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 56% of them (10 requests) were addressed to the original Marketingstudies.net, 33% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (452 ms) belongs to the original domain Marketingstudies.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 161.0 kB (33%)

Content Size

492.4 kB

After Optimization

331.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Marketingstudies.net main page is 492.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 261.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 8.7 kB

  • Original 11.3 kB
  • After minification 8.9 kB
  • After compression 2.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.4 kB, which is 21% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 8.7 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 261.1 kB
  • After minification 261.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Marketing Studies images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 96.2 kB

  • Original 141.9 kB
  • After minification 140.8 kB
  • After compression 45.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 96.2 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 56.1 kB

  • Original 78.1 kB
  • After minification 61.1 kB
  • After compression 22.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Marketingstudies.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 56.1 kB or 72% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (50%)

Requests Now

10

After Optimization

5

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 10 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Marketing Studies. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.marketingstudies.net

www.marketingstudies.net

452 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

14 ms

css

css

38 ms

genericons.css

genericons.css

18 ms

style.css

style.css

19 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

36 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

26 ms

doubletaptogo.js

doubletaptogo.js

26 ms

global.js

global.js

27 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

31 ms

header.jpg

header.jpg

40 ms

v0SdcGFAl2aezM9Vq_aFTQ.ttf

v0SdcGFAl2aezM9Vq_aFTQ.ttf

43 ms

DvlFBScY1r-FMtZSYIYoYw.ttf

DvlFBScY1r-FMtZSYIYoYw.ttf

67 ms

4cKlrioa77J2iqTqBgkRWg.ttf

4cKlrioa77J2iqTqBgkRWg.ttf

70 ms

UC3ZEjagJi85gF9qFaBgIETamuWRjOQSPxoOXgdYd7c.ttf

UC3ZEjagJi85gF9qFaBgIETamuWRjOQSPxoOXgdYd7c.ttf

70 ms

2NBgzUtEeyB-Xtpr9bm1Cczai8e7xzqnKiVb1EwOy0E.ttf

2NBgzUtEeyB-Xtpr9bm1Cczai8e7xzqnKiVb1EwOy0E.ttf

116 ms

9MkijrV-dEJ0-_NWV7E6N218GKU_F_kIyfK-gGC-Yzs.ttf

9MkijrV-dEJ0-_NWV7E6N218GKU_F_kIyfK-gGC-Yzs.ttf

115 ms

AAJ42mNgYGBkAIIztovOg+jz1w7shtEAVsEIvAAA

AAJ42mNgYGBkAIIztovOg+jz1w7shtEAVsEIvAAA

2 ms

Accessibility Review

marketingstudies.net accessibility score

61

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

High

ARIA toggle fields do not have accessible names

High

[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

marketingstudies.net best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

marketingstudies.net SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Marketingstudies.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Marketingstudies.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

marketingstudies.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Marketing Studies. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: