Tools & Wizards About Us
marketstudies.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 10

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    23% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 91% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

marketstudies.com

DeMARK® Analytics - Unrivaled Financial Market Timing

Page Load Speed

2.6 sec in total

First Response

194 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

552 ms

marketstudies.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to marketstudies.com homepage info - get ready to check Market Studies best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about marketstudies.com

For nearly five decades, DeMARK® Analytics and the DeMARK Indicators® have been the premier name in financial market timing.

Visit marketstudies.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Marketstudies.com page load time and found that the first response time was 194 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

marketstudies.com performance score

10

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

18/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value15.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.1 s

6/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,100 ms

24/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1.677

0/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.3 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

demark.com

194 ms

demark.com

337 ms

styles.css

38 ms

style.css

90 ms

css

61 ms

Our browser made a total of 104 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Marketstudies.com, 10% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (6 requests) were made to Staging-demarkcom.kinsta.cloud. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (897 ms) relates to the external source Staging-demarkcom.kinsta.cloud.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 150.9 kB (7%)

Content Size

2.2 MB

After Optimization

2.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Marketstudies.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 90.3 kB

  • Original 108.2 kB
  • After minification 102.4 kB
  • After compression 17.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 90.3 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 56.5 kB

  • Original 1.8 MB
  • After minification 1.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Market Studies images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.0 kB

  • Original 208.6 kB
  • After minification 208.6 kB
  • After compression 207.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-92%

Potential reduce by 3.1 kB

  • Original 3.3 kB
  • After minification 2.3 kB
  • After compression 267 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Marketstudies.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.1 kB or 92% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 64 (80%)

Requests Now

80

After Optimization

16

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 80 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Market Studies. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 36 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

demark.com

demark.com

194 ms

demark.com

demark.com

337 ms

styles.css

styles.css

38 ms

style.css

style.css

90 ms

css

css

61 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

71 ms

iconsmind.css

iconsmind.css

63 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

55 ms

v4-shims.min.css

v4-shims.min.css

83 ms

unit-testing.css

unit-testing.css

48 ms

woocommerce.css

woocommerce.css

85 ms

header.css

header.css

88 ms

ytv.css

ytv.css

94 ms

icon

icon

60 ms

style.css

style.css

106 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

95 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

120 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

116 ms

post-10.css

post-10.css

129 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

142 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

135 ms

v4-shims.min.css

v4-shims.min.css

155 ms

post-3399.css

post-3399.css

158 ms

post-834.css

post-834.css

161 ms

post-2763.css

post-2763.css

160 ms

post-2797.css

post-2797.css

170 ms

css

css

55 ms

css

css

56 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

175 ms

solid.min.css

solid.min.css

195 ms

brands.min.css

brands.min.css

174 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

193 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

186 ms

v4-shims.min.js

v4-shims.min.js

220 ms

hco_fonts.css

hco_fonts.css

155 ms

flaticon.css

flaticon.css

253 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

250 ms

slick.css

slick.css

317 ms

button.css

button.css

318 ms

hero.css

hero.css

320 ms

slider.css

slider.css

318 ms

index.js

index.js

350 ms

index.js

index.js

351 ms

api.js

api.js

70 ms

api.js

api.js

79 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

349 ms

parallax.min.js

parallax.min.js

324 ms

jquery.formstone.min.js

jquery.formstone.min.js

313 ms

main.js

main.js

343 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

330 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

326 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

323 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

323 ms

index.js

index.js

317 ms

jquery.sticky.min.js

jquery.sticky.min.js

386 ms

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

382 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

374 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

369 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

354 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

353 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

389 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

426 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

366 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

366 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

363 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

363 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

412 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

207 ms

pixels-12x12-6percent.png

pixels-12x12-6percent.png

557 ms

e2795695d3c347433fd619115458d4d0

e2795695d3c347433fd619115458d4d0

184 ms

pixels-12x12-25percent.png

pixels-12x12-25percent.png

788 ms

demark-logo.png

demark-logo.png

357 ms

Glasses-Guy-w-Indicators-web-3.jpg

Glasses-Guy-w-Indicators-web-3.jpg

345 ms

symbolik-dark-theme-iso-tall-2.png

symbolik-dark-theme-iso-tall-2.png

348 ms

dm-page-header-integrations-2.jpg

dm-page-header-integrations-2.jpg

346 ms

demark-indicators-combo-dji-1024x679.png

demark-indicators-combo-dji-1024x679.png

346 ms

27-inch-imac-2011-perspective-03-949x1024.png

27-inch-imac-2011-perspective-03-949x1024.png

357 ms

third-party-integrations-logos-5-1024x775.png

third-party-integrations-logos-5-1024x775.png

362 ms

DeMark-Thumbnail-300x169.png

DeMark-Thumbnail-300x169.png

290 ms

Screenshot-from-2022-07-06-16-21-50-300x145.png

Screenshot-from-2022-07-06-16-21-50-300x145.png

293 ms

Screenshot-from-2022-06-22-15-56-17-300x147.png

Screenshot-from-2022-06-22-15-56-17-300x147.png

289 ms

demark-logo-on-dark.png

demark-logo-on-dark.png

275 ms

GothamSSm-Light_Web.woff

GothamSSm-Light_Web.woff

897 ms

GothamSSm-Book_Web.woff

GothamSSm-Book_Web.woff

858 ms

GothamSSm-Medium_Web.woff

GothamSSm-Medium_Web.woff

878 ms

GothamSSm-Bold_Web.woff

GothamSSm-Bold_Web.woff

841 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

374 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

27 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

68 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

87 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fChc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fChc9.ttf

135 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

154 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

156 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxP.ttf

157 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

156 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fChc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fChc9.ttf

156 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

154 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc9.ttf

155 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

157 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

85 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

376 ms

circular-regular.ttf

circular-regular.ttf

395 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

314 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

48 ms

Accessibility Review

marketstudies.com accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

marketstudies.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

marketstudies.com SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Marketstudies.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Marketstudies.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

marketstudies.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Market Studies. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: