Tools & Wizards About Us
marysmailsoulworks.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 25

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    44% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

marysmailsoulworks.co.uk

Psychotherapy | Creative Arts Therapist - Mary Smail Psychotherapist SW2

Page Load Speed

4 sec in total

First Response

650 ms

Resources Loaded

3 sec

Page Rendered

397 ms

marysmailsoulworks.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Visit marysmailsoulworks.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Mary Smail Soulworks content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about marysmailsoulworks.co.uk

Psychotherapist Mary Smail offers a safe space to explore issues. Creative Therapies and Assertion training. London Tulse Hill

Visit marysmailsoulworks.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Marysmailsoulworks.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 650 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

marysmailsoulworks.co.uk performance score

25

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.8 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.2 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value850 ms

34/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.055

98/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value22.0 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

marysmailsoulworks.co.uk

650 ms

js

103 ms

content.min.css

131 ms

bootstrap.min.css

473 ms

bootstrap-responsive.css

437 ms

Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 66% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Marysmailsoulworks.co.uk, 13% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 13% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Marysmailsoulworks.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 934.0 kB (39%)

Content Size

2.4 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Marysmailsoulworks.co.uk main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 74.9 kB

  • Original 87.0 kB
  • After minification 78.4 kB
  • After compression 12.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 74.9 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 33.7 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mary Smail Soulworks images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 228.7 kB

  • Original 311.4 kB
  • After minification 288.5 kB
  • After compression 82.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 228.7 kB or 73% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 596.6 kB

  • Original 688.5 kB
  • After minification 586.2 kB
  • After compression 91.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Marysmailsoulworks.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 596.6 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (70%)

Requests Now

43

After Optimization

13

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mary Smail Soulworks. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

marysmailsoulworks.co.uk

marysmailsoulworks.co.uk

650 ms

js

js

103 ms

content.min.css

content.min.css

131 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

473 ms

bootstrap-responsive.css

bootstrap-responsive.css

437 ms

favth-bootstrap.css

favth-bootstrap.css

751 ms

favsliderpro.css

favsliderpro.css

459 ms

all.css

all.css

181 ms

css

css

41 ms

css

css

53 ms

cookieconsent.min.css

cookieconsent.min.css

462 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

654 ms

jquery-noconflict.js

jquery-noconflict.js

543 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

588 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

644 ms

caption.js

caption.js

580 ms

core.js

core.js

687 ms

favth-bootstrap.js

favth-bootstrap.js

802 ms

cookieconsent.min.js

cookieconsent.min.js

841 ms

init.js

init.js

810 ms

admin.css

admin.css

778 ms

cms.css

cms.css

891 ms

store.css

store.css

885 ms

theme.css

theme.css

1110 ms

style.css

style.css

1035 ms

style10.css

style10.css

977 ms

custom.css

custom.css

945 ms

css

css

60 ms

css

css

60 ms

css

css

61 ms

css

css

61 ms

css

css

67 ms

favth-scripts.js

favth-scripts.js

997 ms

Mary-Smail-SoulworksUK.gif

Mary-Smail-SoulworksUK.gif

779 ms

Mary_Smail_Soulworks_UK.jpg

Mary_Smail_Soulworks_UK.jpg

218 ms

linkedin-in-button.jpg

linkedin-in-button.jpg

140 ms

twitter-bird-white-on-blue.png

twitter-bird-white-on-blue.png

140 ms

Marysmail-soulworksuk.jpg

Marysmail-soulworksuk.jpg

475 ms

demo-image2.jpg

demo-image2.jpg

717 ms

demo-image3.jpg

demo-image3.jpg

590 ms

demo-image4.jpg

demo-image4.jpg

425 ms

demo-image5.jpg

demo-image5.jpg

564 ms

HPC_reg-logo_CMYK.jpg

HPC_reg-logo_CMYK.jpg

545 ms

UKCP.png

UKCP.png

594 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff

19 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVQ.woff

36 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrc.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrc.woff

54 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrc.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrc.woff

63 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

89 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

131 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff

64 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

64 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-.woff

63 ms

Accessibility Review

marysmailsoulworks.co.uk accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

marysmailsoulworks.co.uk best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

marysmailsoulworks.co.uk SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Marysmailsoulworks.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Marysmailsoulworks.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

marysmailsoulworks.co.uk

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Mary Smail Soulworks. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: