10.1 sec in total
15 ms
9.8 sec
315 ms
Click here to check amazing MA Ss DOT Physical content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about massdotphysical.com
DOT physical exam MA - a one-stop-shop for physical examinations for those who are getting licenses in Massachusettes for driving heavy vehicles
Visit massdotphysical.comWe analyzed Massdotphysical.com page load time and found that the first response time was 15 ms and then it took 10.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
massdotphysical.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.0 s
9/100
10%
Value14.3 s
0/100
25%
Value10.4 s
8/100
10%
Value1,480 ms
14/100
30%
Value0.399
25/100
15%
Value13.9 s
10/100
10%
15 ms
2566 ms
358 ms
125 ms
149 ms
Our browser made a total of 110 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Massdotphysical.com, 81% (89 requests) were made to Nedotphysicals.com and 14% (15 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.7 sec) relates to the external source Nedotphysicals.com.
Page size can be reduced by 81.9 kB (5%)
1.5 MB
1.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Massdotphysical.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 646.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 76.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 76.7 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. MA Ss DOT Physical images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 2.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Massdotphysical.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 79 (95%)
83
4
The browser has sent 83 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of MA Ss DOT Physical. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 76 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
massdotphysical.com
15 ms
nedotphysicals.com
2566 ms
autoptimize_2424cb5371537858ccac32203e1e6ac2.css
358 ms
autoptimize_single_9e661da1eae06062e8c109bee9a9fec9.css
125 ms
autoptimize_single_a07c23e4f73d3f04890298ab831e650f.css
149 ms
autoptimize_single_8051b0c2715cc99de5bbc2f2420952f0.css
109 ms
ScrollToPlugin.min.js
103 ms
autoptimize_single_ccb1226da47b8ea13d20fb06c1de8f01.js
1289 ms
jquery.min.js
253 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
482 ms
autoptimize_single_d832bae23c6d37f55d80a62987987b7d.js
480 ms
css
42 ms
autoptimize_single_39c4b7a925619c615dde86e538e7290e.js
261 ms
rbtools.min.js
713 ms
rs6.min.js
558 ms
js
78 ms
email-decode.min.js
479 ms
autoptimize_single_7b55c0b1213e5c45b50ce88fde512dba.js
481 ms
autoptimize_single_a1d83487ed80fc61247455972ef16818.js
480 ms
autoptimize_single_56bcd1e4d24324da6588a5bde73bdb0f.js
553 ms
core.min.js
530 ms
accordion.min.js
722 ms
tabs.min.js
852 ms
autoptimize_single_eae574630691cbf72e5796b9d7572260.js
638 ms
modernizr.min.js
892 ms
autoptimize_single_72f19f5f564a43b1175f9ce86981987c.js
738 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
967 ms
autoptimize_single_d5b41c85347745f9b6a2275abd5ad84b.js
841 ms
autoptimize_single_6d86e8c33e221a30c409dd9510bc66b1.js
821 ms
autoptimize_single_da79e5d89801c31d6c4fc14c4b4b2331.js
1158 ms
autoptimize_single_95ba7bb2e3c9da8d1322daadc7ce2457.js
929 ms
autoptimize_single_c8cc66a2ffc63efc356237634245fbb3.js
1209 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
1095 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
1955 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
1063 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
1171 ms
infinitescroll.min.js
1412 ms
autoptimize_single_f556337e0f81cf84d8e083a0a0c07ea4.js
1245 ms
jquery.form.min.js
1253 ms
waypoints.min.js
1927 ms
jplayer.min.js
1317 ms
autoptimize_single_4d0379f34605a637fc1fe32344a29096.js
1826 ms
autoptimize_single_3637fe9df875e14939193bc389e1a249.js
1377 ms
Chart.min.js
1783 ms
autoptimize_single_38ade284e1c3428a4f273a5d7d253946.js
1248 ms
autoptimize_single_b069611efe4105113881d6eda1ea9765.js
1673 ms
autoptimize_single_9838d1a5b6ef93abeecb76ae6308505f.js
1229 ms
jquery.multiscroll.min.js
2365 ms
jquery.justifiedGallery.min.js
1639 ms
autoptimize_single_417dc6f4e0f100a3c3be578d7f6f4174.js
2174 ms
jquery.sticky-kit.min.js
1631 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
2789 ms
autoptimize_single_f0bd775e1952416ed0f05e43678517a3.js
1516 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1.min.js
1647 ms
lemmon-slider.min.js
1640 ms
jquery.fullPage.min.js
1755 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
1585 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
1647 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
1650 ms
packery-mode.pkgd.min.js
1800 ms
autoptimize_single_33ce418cee8273af0cfd13c55bf91b05.js
1756 ms
autoptimize_single_9ae82f0efe3e33139fecb89cfee71c08.js
2575 ms
rangeslider.min.js
1789 ms
autoptimize_single_3ab5f5c9566d78e5ff0cd9c14558ca28.js
2520 ms
autoptimize_single_31faf3f12dd15a68da9c210bc90b1e32.js
1782 ms
swiper.min.js
1773 ms
TweenLite.min.js
1743 ms
smoothPageScroll.min.js
1769 ms
autoptimize_single_a6a5ea41f5c0e370bf413b29a485d7b4.js
1788 ms
default.min.js
2462 ms
comment-reply.min.js
2134 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
1788 ms
Doctor4.5.jpg
84 ms
qode-like.min.js
5136 ms
Physical.png
80 ms
smush-lazy-load.min.js
5656 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
3699 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
2168 ms
js
91 ms
analytics.js
176 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
176 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf
343 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
405 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
402 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
418 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
421 ms
waypoints.min.js
2020 ms
frontend.min.js
1947 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf
226 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf
224 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aX8.ttf
226 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aX8.ttf
257 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf
228 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf
258 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf
228 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aX8.ttf
229 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aX8.ttf
254 ms
collect
48 ms
underscore.min.js
1816 ms
wp-util.min.js
1821 ms
frontend.min.js
1839 ms
ElegantIcons.woff
2567 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
2177 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
1854 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
4936 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
2362 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
2648 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
2561 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
3009 ms
Doctor.jpg
2899 ms
massdotphysical.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
massdotphysical.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
massdotphysical.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Massdotphysical.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Massdotphysical.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
massdotphysical.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of MA Ss DOT Physical. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: