2.4 sec in total
147 ms
1.8 sec
391 ms
Click here to check amazing Massive content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about massive.net
Massive Studios is a full service graphic design & branding agency in Bozeman, Montana. We help our clients lead and innovate. We build great brands by creating engaging experiences for consumers wher...
Visit massive.netWe analyzed Massive.net page load time and found that the first response time was 147 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
massive.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.1 s
80/100
10%
Value2.7 s
85/100
25%
Value4.1 s
80/100
10%
Value500 ms
58/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value8.2 s
41/100
10%
147 ms
239 ms
58 ms
38 ms
21 ms
Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 38% of them (21 requests) were addressed to the original Massive.net, 14% (8 requests) were made to Snapwidget.com and 14% (8 requests) were made to Scontent.cdninstagram.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source Player.vimeo.com.
Page size can be reduced by 92.2 kB (3%)
3.6 MB
3.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Massive.net main page is 3.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 8.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 8.3 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 50.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Massive images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 32.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.1 kB or 38% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Massive.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.6 kB or 15% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (38%)
47
29
The browser has sent 47 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Massive. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
massive.net
147 ms
massive.net
239 ms
master.css
58 ms
snapwidget.js
38 ms
jquery.min.js
21 ms
jquery.ui.totop.js
114 ms
yoi0iwm.js
169 ms
reset.css
107 ms
1224.css
113 ms
type.css
163 ms
analytics.js
177 ms
101175450
1228 ms
100942552
719 ms
424940
492 ms
massive-logo.svg
69 ms
header_lg.jpg
402 ms
simms_fishing.jpg
70 ms
leica_logo.jpg
69 ms
sol.jpg
122 ms
west_paw_logo.jpg
122 ms
gore.jpg
123 ms
sitka.jpg
175 ms
acorn_logo.jpg
177 ms
sageborn_logo.jpg
177 ms
oboz_logo.jpg
176 ms
red_lodge_ales_logo.jpg
180 ms
barnard_logo.jpg
231 ms
back.jpg
282 ms
d
11 ms
d
42 ms
d
44 ms
d
42 ms
d
42 ms
collect
23 ms
js
69 ms
p.gif
46 ms
embed.vendor.min.760717b3f565c387.css
13 ms
embed.style.min.41abd7aaef93351c.css
28 ms
embed.grid.min.4069f6f840f9102b.css
23 ms
js
51 ms
embed.vendor.min.2f17f0b14ee46c5a.js
23 ms
embed.main.min.65b73ba9362828bd.js
20 ms
iframeResizer.contentWindow.min.0da4d54c7d115e53.js
47 ms
vcd15cbe7772f49c399c6a5babf22c1241717689176015
72 ms
collect
30 ms
collect
37 ms
js
38 ms
api.js
14 ms
124663464_392978432064084_8326186851100581222_n.jpg
83 ms
130286590_2876943895871264_1759385762302592123_n.jpg
122 ms
132484959_3557467371026858_7133167744958871445_n.jpg
127 ms
140575227_415167436576480_247589762445512417_n.jpg
111 ms
272062993_453448409492402_721481579507262672_n.jpg
248 ms
297681764_3215874608666484_8083389131742745114_n.jpg
113 ms
320440607_1520274495141285_1727394010675170451_n.jpg
99 ms
427975828_997352871901244_7530943691767260222_n.jpg
158 ms
massive.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
massive.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
massive.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
![]()
EN
![]()
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Massive.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Massive.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
massive.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Massive. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: