Tools & Wizards About Us
master-review.ru screenshot

Report Summary

  • 16

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    30% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

master-review.ru

Домен не прилинкован ни к одной из директорий на сервере!

Page Load Speed

7.2 sec in total

First Response

755 ms

Resources Loaded

6 sec

Page Rendered

506 ms

master-review.ru screenshot

About Website

Visit master-review.ru now to see the best up-to-date Master Review content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about master-review.ru

⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ ТОП-Рейтинг ремонт и дизайн квартир. Отзывы о ремонтных компаниях Москвы 2020. Читайте отзывы и комментарии о компаниях по ремонту квартир.

Visit master-review.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Master-review.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 755 ms and then it took 6.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

master-review.ru performance score

16

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.6 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value18.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value20.1 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,150 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.004

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value33.0 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

master-review.ru

755 ms

autoptimize_single_ee78f26525b08d4e372b92a1a3ed1d26-6.1.0.css

295 ms

autoptimize_single_07cbe55d3b4a9fb7f079a6b3411159ea-6.1.0.css

571 ms

autoptimize_single_e6fae855021a88a0067fcc58121c594f-5.5.2.css

442 ms

autoptimize_single_68ed2b23e23600933cbfd9020680f085-2.0.6.css

439 ms

Our browser made a total of 85 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 55% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Master-review.ru, 19% (16 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (5 requests) were made to Gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Master-review.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 128.0 kB (8%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Master-review.ru main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 126.1 kB

  • Original 151.8 kB
  • After minification 151.6 kB
  • After compression 25.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 126.1 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.8 kB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Master Review images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 63 B

  • Original 713 B
  • After minification 703 B
  • After compression 650 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 24.3 kB
  • After minification 24.3 kB
  • After compression 24.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Master-review.ru has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 45 (69%)

Requests Now

65

After Optimization

20

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Master Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 29 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

master-review.ru

master-review.ru

755 ms

autoptimize_single_ee78f26525b08d4e372b92a1a3ed1d26-6.1.0.css

autoptimize_single_ee78f26525b08d4e372b92a1a3ed1d26-6.1.0.css

295 ms

autoptimize_single_07cbe55d3b4a9fb7f079a6b3411159ea-6.1.0.css

autoptimize_single_07cbe55d3b4a9fb7f079a6b3411159ea-6.1.0.css

571 ms

autoptimize_single_e6fae855021a88a0067fcc58121c594f-5.5.2.css

autoptimize_single_e6fae855021a88a0067fcc58121c594f-5.5.2.css

442 ms

autoptimize_single_68ed2b23e23600933cbfd9020680f085-2.0.6.css

autoptimize_single_68ed2b23e23600933cbfd9020680f085-2.0.6.css

439 ms

autoptimize_single_e1dd0bea023fff8afa1af149d1a04a1b-2.0.6.css

autoptimize_single_e1dd0bea023fff8afa1af149d1a04a1b-2.0.6.css

448 ms

autoptimize_single_1cbcc9e85ba99c007f519bf1a67feb58-5.9.1.css

autoptimize_single_1cbcc9e85ba99c007f519bf1a67feb58-5.9.1.css

446 ms

autoptimize_single_7892d7349e74e7dd7fae386eda2dded7-5.9.1.css

autoptimize_single_7892d7349e74e7dd7fae386eda2dded7-5.9.1.css

453 ms

elementor-icons.min-5.13.0.css

elementor-icons.min-5.13.0.css

588 ms

frontend-legacy.min-3.4.7.css

frontend-legacy.min-3.4.7.css

589 ms

frontend.min-3.4.7.css

frontend.min-3.4.7.css

601 ms

post-3957-1636636216.css

post-3957-1636636216.css

599 ms

font-awesome.min-4.7.0.css

font-awesome.min-4.7.0.css

605 ms

global-1636636216.css

global-1636636216.css

715 ms

post-27-1636636216.css

post-27-1636636216.css

735 ms

pum-site-styles.css

pum-site-styles.css

735 ms

autoptimize_single_6e0027d6c63c7fef96400918850447fe-2.3.4.css

autoptimize_single_6e0027d6c63c7fef96400918850447fe-2.3.4.css

750 ms

autoptimize_single_27c32f5fe2f4046149767a51bd31d9ab-2.3.4.css

autoptimize_single_27c32f5fe2f4046149767a51bd31d9ab-2.3.4.css

754 ms

icon

icon

30 ms

autoptimize_single_6ba0d8f64fdf9dbea96c136aaa1557e4-5.9.1.css

autoptimize_single_6ba0d8f64fdf9dbea96c136aaa1557e4-5.9.1.css

748 ms

autoptimize_single_2e9cf64b94bdd368bfd9a9c585b0b830-2.3.4.css

autoptimize_single_2e9cf64b94bdd368bfd9a9c585b0b830-2.3.4.css

999 ms

autoptimize_single_4f5507d2322441f2b97ca06ef1f60ecb-2.3.4.css

autoptimize_single_4f5507d2322441f2b97ca06ef1f60ecb-2.3.4.css

1172 ms

autoptimize_single_1a93f9525c74964d1f5d1f532aec6716.css

autoptimize_single_1a93f9525c74964d1f5d1f532aec6716.css

883 ms

mylisting-dynamic-styles-1634405680.css

mylisting-dynamic-styles-1634405680.css

896 ms

css

css

41 ms

jquery.min-3.6.0.js

jquery.min-3.6.0.js

1047 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

74 ms

gtm-local.js

gtm-local.js

772 ms

autoptimize_single_634d96c0e6c8d66b62518094be81cd6e-2.0.6.css

autoptimize_single_634d96c0e6c8d66b62518094be81cd6e-2.0.6.css

891 ms

animations.min-3.4.7.css

animations.min-3.4.7.css

904 ms

regenerator-runtime.min-0.13.7.js

regenerator-runtime.min-0.13.7.js

923 ms

wp-polyfill.min-3.15.0.js

wp-polyfill.min-3.15.0.js

1005 ms

api.js

api.js

42 ms

js

js

76 ms

moment.min-2.29.1.js

moment.min-2.29.1.js

1184 ms

ru.js

ru.js

181 ms

autoptimize_c1da130f89b8225ca5c7719c6b221492.js

autoptimize_c1da130f89b8225ca5c7719c6b221492.js

1655 ms

css

css

14 ms

logo.png

logo.png

1001 ms

5_star.png

5_star.png

183 ms

pvh.jpg

pvh.jpg

512 ms

tick.svg

tick.svg

182 ms

957921.jpg

957921.jpg

181 ms

35ed8d6316a4.jpg

35ed8d6316a4.jpg

693 ms

original-1.jpeg

original-1.jpeg

831 ms

2637180066.jpg

2637180066.jpg

553 ms

ribkanadin_181206_t.jpg

ribkanadin_181206_t.jpg

553 ms

38816.jpeg

38816.jpeg

762 ms

otzyv-klienta_3.jpeg

otzyv-klienta_3.jpeg

820 ms

original.jpeg

original.jpeg

983 ms

cd5517456cc2134e8cf785cd2c5865db.jpg

cd5517456cc2134e8cf785cd2c5865db.jpg

836 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

154 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

47 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu5mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu5mxP.ttf

103 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fABc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fABc9.ttf

173 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fABc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fABc9.ttf

171 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxMIzc.ttf

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxMIzc.ttf

172 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfABc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfABc9.ttf

171 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfABc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfABc9.ttf

172 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

761 ms

flUhRq6tzZclQEJ-Vdg-IuiaDsNZ.ttf

flUhRq6tzZclQEJ-Vdg-IuiaDsNZ.ttf

233 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1Mu51xMIzc.ttf

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1Mu51xMIzc.ttf

174 ms

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51S7ACc-CsE.ttf

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51S7ACc-CsE.ttf

174 ms

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TjASc-CsE.ttf

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TjASc-CsE.ttf

176 ms

KFOiCnqEu92Fr1Mu51QrEzQdKg.ttf

KFOiCnqEu92Fr1Mu51QrEzQdKg.ttf

174 ms

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TzBic-CsE.ttf

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TzBic-CsE.ttf

174 ms

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TLBCc-CsE.ttf

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TLBCc-CsE.ttf

231 ms

icomoon.ttf

icomoon.ttf

836 ms

ga-local.js

ga-local.js

865 ms

gen_204

gen_204

95 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

144 ms

cookie.js

cookie.js

115 ms

integrator.js

integrator.js

115 ms

ads

ads

87 ms

anchor

anchor

36 ms

styles__ltr.css

styles__ltr.css

7 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

16 ms

webworker.js

webworker.js

48 ms

logo_48.png

logo_48.png

26 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

21 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

20 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

22 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

26 ms

collect

collect

25 ms

autoptimize_single_456663a286a204386735fd775542a59e-5.9.1.css

autoptimize_single_456663a286a204386735fd775542a59e-5.9.1.css

157 ms

Accessibility Review

master-review.ru accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

master-review.ru best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

master-review.ru SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Master-review.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Master-review.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

master-review.ru

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Master Review. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: