2.5 sec in total
73 ms
2.2 sec
280 ms
Visit masterformat.com now to see the best up-to-date Master Format content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about masterformat.com
Visit masterformat.comWe analyzed Masterformat.com page load time and found that the first response time was 73 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
masterformat.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value10.9 s
0/100
10%
Value23.3 s
0/100
25%
Value11.0 s
6/100
10%
Value990 ms
28/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value19.7 s
2/100
10%
73 ms
51 ms
244 ms
211 ms
163 ms
Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Masterformat.com, 14% (11 requests) were made to Csiresources.org and 12% (9 requests) were made to D2x5ku95bkycr3.cloudfront.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (608 ms) relates to the external source Use.typekit.net.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (55%)
2.2 MB
985.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Masterformat.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 974.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 62.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 62.3 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 856.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Master Format needs image optimization as it can save up to 856.1 kB or 97% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 281.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 281.9 kB or 29% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 36 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Masterformat.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 51 (84%)
61
10
The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Master Format. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 36 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
masterformat.com
73 ms
www.masterformat.com
51 ms
masterformat
244 ms
js
211 ms
all.min.css
163 ms
prism.min.css
184 ms
bootstrap.min.css
142 ms
Desktop_bundle.min.3eaae64f6d336febe6a8982646283e819685c116.hash.css
183 ms
jquery-ui.css
153 ms
34
158 ms
css
161 ms
css
239 ms
slick.css
203 ms
slick-theme.css
233 ms
css
251 ms
aos.css
181 ms
featherlight.min.css
243 ms
app.css
232 ms
style.css
316 ms
promise-fetch-polyfill.js
146 ms
system.min.js
139 ms
importmapping-cdn.json
94 ms
hlq-2024-05-08.js
158 ms
hlqmigrate-2024-05-08.js
204 ms
hlqui-2024-05-08.js
239 ms
bootstrap.min.js
138 ms
easyXDM.Min.js
194 ms
prism.min.js
230 ms
prism-autoloader.min.js
236 ms
Desktop_bundle.min.f4f5e9916c4ffad54a043d74857e307527177fd0.hash.js
241 ms
hfc2sfz.js
200 ms
d67f56a0.js
199 ms
bc385326.js
235 ms
slick.min.js
241 ms
aos.js
235 ms
circletype.min.js
241 ms
featherlight.min.js
239 ms
826067e20d.js
197 ms
webcomponents-lite.min.js
198 ms
moment.min.js
241 ms
37293
198 ms
WebForms.js
200 ms
MenuStandards.js
197 ms
MicrosoftAjax.js
200 ms
MicrosoftAjaxWebForms.js
202 ms
ReactRootLegacy~hlReactRootLegacyRemote.bundle.ae6ae83bee78f964d62e.hash.js
200 ms
ReactRoot~runtime~main.bundle.4f50500b9e6971ee5185.hash.js
197 ms
ReactRoot~react-_yarn_cache_react-npm-18_2_0-1eae08fee2-b9214a9bd7_zip_node_modules_react_index_js.bundle.012593f3ef708f027ac2.hash.js
196 ms
ReactRoot~vendor-_yarn___virtual___react-dom-virtual-05f150c4a1_0_cache_react-dom-npm-18_2_0-dd675bca1c-65c11b.bundle.8b02460446e4027ef67f.hash.js
232 ms
ReactRoot~vendor-_yarn___virtual___react-dom-virtual-05f150c4a1_0_cache_react-dom-npm-18_2_0-dd675bca1c-17e4a5.bundle.1dbb26f4013744b692d1.hash.js
199 ms
ReactRoot~vendor-_yarn_cache_lodash-npm-4_17_21-6382451519-c08619c038_zip_node_modules_lodash_lodash_js.bundle.8d689d0e26f432a3f17d.hash.js
233 ms
ReactRoot~main.bundle.e34782a6cd2d7122cf69.hash.js
231 ms
MagnetLeads.js
195 ms
bluebird.3.5.0.min.js
4 ms
fetch-polyfill.js
13 ms
woff.css
20 ms
gtm.js
67 ms
CSI_Logo_Website_Header.png
96 ms
loading.gif
30 ms
MasterFormat-digital-mockup.png
402 ms
woff.css
357 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
32 ms
8AAnjaY2BgYGQAghu7bvGC6JsMPfdhNABL6gcDAAA=
6 ms
d
306 ms
d
605 ms
d
606 ms
d
608 ms
d
608 ms
d
605 ms
d
608 ms
blank.htm
565 ms
352 ms
LYjYdG7kmE0gV69VVPPdFl06VN8XG4S11zY.ttf
290 ms
LYjYdG7kmE0gV69VVPPdFl06VN8lG4S11zY.ttf
291 ms
vfYHSPwBd1gm5AA==
40 ms
easyXDM.min.js
76 ms
p.gif
40 ms
masterformat.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
masterformat.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
masterformat.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Masterformat.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Masterformat.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
masterformat.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Master Format. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: