Report Summary

  • 29

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    49% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 72% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

mastic.com

Mastic - Ply Gem

Page Load Speed

1.8 sec in total

First Response

153 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

401 ms

mastic.com screenshot

About Website

Visit mastic.com now to see the best up-to-date Mastic content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about mastic.com

Mastic Home Exteriors by Ply Gem is the “Exterior Solution” that includes vinyl siding, polymer shakes, replacement windows, shutters, soffit, gutters and gutter protection.

Visit mastic.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Mastic.com page load time and found that the first response time was 153 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

mastic.com performance score

29

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.1 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.1 s

44/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value980 ms

28/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.014

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.8 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

mastic.com

153 ms

masticroot

89 ms

masticroot

101 ms

mastic

271 ms

mashup:ra:collection

284 ms

Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Mastic.com, 90% (43 requests) were made to Plygem.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (366 ms) relates to the external source Plygem.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 117.2 kB (18%)

Content Size

668.2 kB

After Optimization

551.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Mastic.com main page is 668.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 524.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 71.8 kB

  • Original 86.3 kB
  • After minification 66.0 kB
  • After compression 14.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 20.3 kB, which is 24% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 71.8 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 10.5 kB

  • Original 524.3 kB
  • After minification 513.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mastic images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-60%

Potential reduce by 32.0 kB

  • Original 52.9 kB
  • After minification 52.9 kB
  • After compression 20.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.0 kB or 60% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 3.0 kB

  • Original 4.6 kB
  • After minification 3.9 kB
  • After compression 1.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mastic.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.0 kB or 64% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (10%)

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

37

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mastic. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

mastic.com accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

mastic.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Requests the geolocation permission on page load

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

mastic.com SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mastic.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mastic.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Mastic. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: