Tools & Wizards About Us
material-change.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 23

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    41% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

material-change.com

Material Change – Anaerobic Digestion & Composting

Page Load Speed

6.1 sec in total

First Response

277 ms

Resources Loaded

4.9 sec

Page Rendered

884 ms

material-change.com screenshot

About Website

Visit material-change.com now to see the best up-to-date Material Change content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about material-change.com

Recycling Solutions. Material Change offer a diverse range of solutions to meet all your recycling needs, whether it's waste disposal, site management

Visit material-change.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Material-change.com page load time and found that the first response time was 277 ms and then it took 5.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

material-change.com performance score

23

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

17/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value19.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.1 s

9/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value900 ms

31/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.168

71/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.3 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

material-change.com

277 ms

www.material-change.com

978 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

255 ms

style.min.css

258 ms

styles.css

253 ms

Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Material-change.com, 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Material-change.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 503.8 kB (13%)

Content Size

3.8 MB

After Optimization

3.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Material-change.com main page is 3.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 68.6 kB

  • Original 81.0 kB
  • After minification 65.5 kB
  • After compression 12.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 15.5 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 68.6 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 238.4 kB

  • Original 3.1 MB
  • After minification 2.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Material Change images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-34%

Potential reduce by 196.0 kB

  • Original 576.2 kB
  • After minification 566.4 kB
  • After compression 380.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 196.0 kB or 34% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 778 B

  • Original 67.5 kB
  • After minification 67.5 kB
  • After compression 66.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Material-change.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (64%)

Requests Now

47

After Optimization

17

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 47 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Material Change. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

material-change.com

material-change.com

277 ms

www.material-change.com

www.material-change.com

978 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

255 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

258 ms

styles.css

styles.css

253 ms

pagenavi-css.css

pagenavi-css.css

251 ms

accordion.min.css

accordion.min.css

256 ms

jquery.bxslider.css

jquery.bxslider.css

253 ms

uikit.min.css

uikit.min.css

587 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

591 ms

ionicons.min.css

ionicons.min.css

505 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

509 ms

core.css

core.css

500 ms

theme.css

theme.css

501 ms

css

css

38 ms

front.min.css

front.min.css

750 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

956 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

756 ms

front.min.js

front.min.js

756 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

835 ms

api.js

api.js

41 ms

uikit.min.js

uikit.min.js

1077 ms

lightbox.min.js

lightbox.min.js

1077 ms

accordion.min.js

accordion.min.js

1077 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.js

jquery.easing.1.3.js

1077 ms

jquery.bxslider.min.js

jquery.bxslider.min.js

1239 ms

countup.min.js

countup.min.js

1256 ms

js

js

77 ms

map.js

map.js

1355 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

1451 ms

script.js

script.js

1355 ms

calculator_area.js

calculator_area.js

1371 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

1481 ms

logo.png

logo.png

675 ms

scroll.png

scroll.png

681 ms

ad-site-1-1500x700.png

ad-site-1-1500x700.png

1250 ms

HBPL-PRESS-RELEASE.jpg

HBPL-PRESS-RELEASE.jpg

923 ms

Photo-30-05-2022-09-24-43-1500x700.jpg

Photo-30-05-2022-09-24-43-1500x700.jpg

1170 ms

Banner-9-1500x500.jpg

Banner-9-1500x500.jpg

1006 ms

Banner-3-1500x500.jpg

Banner-3-1500x500.jpg

1087 ms

ico-1.png

ico-1.png

929 ms

ico-2.png

ico-2.png

1177 ms

ico-3.png

ico-3.png

1178 ms

footer-watermark.png

footer-watermark.png

1257 ms

logo-footer.png

logo-footer.png

1336 ms

locations-bg.png

locations-bg.png

1796 ms

font

font

110 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

1558 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

1582 ms

section-welcome-image-4.png

section-welcome-image-4.png

1917 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

108 ms

ajax-loader.svg

ajax-loader.svg

924 ms

Accessibility Review

material-change.com accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

material-change.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

material-change.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Material-change.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Material-change.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

material-change.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Material Change. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: