Tools & Wizards About Us
matrixoffice.ru screenshot

Report Summary

  • 32

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    52% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 97

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

matrixoffice.ru

Матрикс

Page Load Speed

3.9 sec in total

First Response

525 ms

Resources Loaded

3.1 sec

Page Rendered

192 ms

matrixoffice.ru screenshot

About Website

Visit matrixoffice.ru now to see the best up-to-date Matrixoffice content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about matrixoffice.ru

Матрикс

Visit matrixoffice.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Matrixoffice.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 525 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

matrixoffice.ru performance score

32

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.7 s

5/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.3 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.2 s

9/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value730 ms

40/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.7 s

22/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

matrixoffice.ru

525 ms

www.matrixoffice.ru

775 ms

reset.css

258 ms

lightbox.css

252 ms

styles_gallery.css

251 ms

Our browser made a total of 103 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (71 requests) were addressed to the original Matrixoffice.ru, 7% (7 requests) were made to Mc.yandex.ru and 4% (4 requests) were made to Yastatic.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (864 ms) belongs to the original domain Matrixoffice.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 481.9 kB (63%)

Content Size

767.1 kB

After Optimization

285.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Matrixoffice.ru main page is 767.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 551.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 101.2 kB

  • Original 115.7 kB
  • After minification 77.9 kB
  • After compression 14.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 37.9 kB, which is 33% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 101.2 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 7.7 kB

  • Original 34.6 kB
  • After minification 26.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Matrixoffice needs image optimization as it can save up to 7.7 kB or 22% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-58%

Potential reduce by 317.6 kB

  • Original 551.1 kB
  • After minification 526.4 kB
  • After compression 233.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 317.6 kB or 58% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 55.4 kB

  • Original 65.6 kB
  • After minification 49.6 kB
  • After compression 10.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Matrixoffice.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 55.4 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 80 (84%)

Requests Now

95

After Optimization

15

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 95 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Matrixoffice. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

matrixoffice.ru

matrixoffice.ru

525 ms

www.matrixoffice.ru

www.matrixoffice.ru

775 ms

reset.css

reset.css

258 ms

lightbox.css

lightbox.css

252 ms

styles_gallery.css

styles_gallery.css

251 ms

jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css

jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css

254 ms

jquery-ui-1.8.16.custom.css

jquery-ui-1.8.16.custom.css

398 ms

callback.css

callback.css

272 ms

jquery-1.4.3.min.js

jquery-1.4.3.min.js

626 ms

jquery-ui.custom.min.js

jquery-ui.custom.min.js

504 ms

jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.pack.js

jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.pack.js

379 ms

script.js

script.js

384 ms

jquery_004.js

jquery_004.js

679 ms

jquery_003.js

jquery_003.js

504 ms

callback.js

callback.js

514 ms

template_styles.css

template_styles.css

645 ms

openapi.js

openapi.js

389 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

9 ms

share.js

share.js

13 ms

top100.jcn

top100.jcn

374 ms

watch_visor.js

watch_visor.js

170 ms

conversion.js

conversion.js

19 ms

watch_visor.js

watch_visor.js

483 ms

banner-88x31-rambler-blue.gif

banner-88x31-rambler-blue.gif

450 ms

en.gif

en.gif

132 ms

top_logo.gif

top_logo.gif

139 ms

ask_quest.gif

ask_quest.gif

130 ms

callback_btn.gif

callback_btn.gif

128 ms

top_menu_bg.gif

top_menu_bg.gif

139 ms

top_menu_bg_l.gif

top_menu_bg_l.gif

126 ms

top_m_bord.gif

top_m_bord.gif

254 ms

top_menu_bg_r.gif

top_menu_bg_r.gif

253 ms

flash-bg.png

flash-bg.png

256 ms

grey_corn_left_bord.gif

grey_corn_left_bord.gif

263 ms

grey_corn_top_bord.gif

grey_corn_top_bord.gif

270 ms

grey_corn_bottom_bord.gif

grey_corn_bottom_bord.gif

272 ms

grey_corn_left_top.gif

grey_corn_left_top.gif

382 ms

grey_corn_righ_top.gif

grey_corn_righ_top.gif

381 ms

grey_corn_left_bottom.gif

grey_corn_left_bottom.gif

383 ms

grey_corn_right_bottom.gif

grey_corn_right_bottom.gif

392 ms

blue_plashka.gif

blue_plashka.gif

402 ms

blue_plashka_l.gif

blue_plashka_l.gif

408 ms

blue_plashka_r.gif

blue_plashka_r.gif

498 ms

blue_plashka_bullet.gif

blue_plashka_bullet.gif

499 ms

m_arrow.gif

m_arrow.gif

504 ms

IMG_3187_64x96px.jpg

IMG_3187_64x96px.jpg

652 ms

obr_svyaz.gif

obr_svyaz.gif

534 ms

all_serv.gif

all_serv.gif

511 ms

all_serv_l_b.gif

all_serv_l_b.gif

590 ms

all_serv_r_b.gif

all_serv_r_b.gif

591 ms

sticker_title.gif

sticker_title.gif

597 ms

sticker_title_l_t.gif

sticker_title_l_t.gif

634 ms

sticker_title_r_t.gif

sticker_title_r_t.gif

645 ms

sticker_title_l_b.gif

sticker_title_l_b.gif

747 ms

sticker_title_r_b.gif

sticker_title_r_b.gif

747 ms

sticker_title_arr.gif

sticker_title_arr.gif

747 ms

blue_arrow.gif

blue_arrow.gif

751 ms

all_arrow.gif

all_arrow.gif

777 ms

white_b_t.gif

white_b_t.gif

780 ms

white_b_b.gif

white_b_b.gif

837 ms

like.php

like.php

74 ms

hit

hit

273 ms

top100.scn

top100.scn

127 ms

ga.js

ga.js

34 ms

46 ms

code.cgi

code.cgi

275 ms

white_b_l.gif

white_b_l.gif

751 ms

white_b_r.gif

white_b_r.gif

760 ms

white_b_l_t.gif

white_b_l_t.gif

793 ms

white_b_r_t.gif

white_b_r_t.gif

808 ms

white_b_l_b.gif

white_b_l_b.gif

828 ms

white_b_r_b.gif

white_b_r_b.gif

864 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

12 ms

33 ms

vpc6VNjRPXV.js

vpc6VNjRPXV.js

277 ms

LVx-xkvaJ0b.png

LVx-xkvaJ0b.png

313 ms

33 ms

controller2.png

controller2.png

751 ms

controller1.png

controller1.png

759 ms

white_t.gif

white_t.gif

794 ms

white_b.gif

white_b.gif

808 ms

white_l.gif

white_l.gif

836 ms

white_r.gif

white_r.gif

854 ms

white_l_t.gif

white_l_t.gif

744 ms

white_r_t.gif

white_r_t.gif

755 ms

white_l_b.gif

white_l_b.gif

797 ms

335 ms

white_r_b.gif

white_r_b.gif

810 ms

footer_shad.gif

footer_shad.gif

835 ms

overlay.png

overlay.png

840 ms

advert.gif

advert.gif

90 ms

button.831500944bc3eb7ea5276ccdc3f71d2e.js

button.831500944bc3eb7ea5276ccdc3f71d2e.js

22 ms

b-share-form-button.png

b-share-form-button.png

18 ms

watch.js

watch.js

88 ms

ui-bg_flat_75_ffffff_40x100.png

ui-bg_flat_75_ffffff_40x100.png

473 ms

b-share-form-button_share__icon.png

b-share-form-button_share__icon.png

16 ms

b-share-icon.png

b-share-icon.png

20 ms

b-share-popup_down__tail.png

b-share-popup_down__tail.png

20 ms

tweet_button.6a78875565a912489e9aef879c881358.ru.html

tweet_button.6a78875565a912489e9aef879c881358.ru.html

14 ms

watch.js

watch.js

211 ms

1

1

91 ms

jot

jot

95 ms

26812653

26812653

91 ms

Accessibility Review

matrixoffice.ru accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

matrixoffice.ru best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

matrixoffice.ru SEO score

97

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Matrixoffice.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Matrixoffice.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

matrixoffice.ru

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Matrixoffice. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: