Report Summary

  • 97

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    94% of other websites

  • 54

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 23% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 64

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    24% of websites

matrixscale.com

Matrix Scale Service - Floor scales, Bench scales, Counting scales, Industrial scales, Digital Indicators, Rental Scales, Scale Service, Load Cells

Page Load Speed

623 ms in total

First Response

80 ms

Resources Loaded

336 ms

Page Rendered

207 ms

matrixscale.com screenshot

About Website

Visit matrixscale.com now to see the best up-to-date Matrix Scale content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about matrixscale.com

Weights and Measures accredited company. Manufactures floor scales and bench scales. Full service department providing preventive maintenance programs to their customers. Full Rental department

Visit matrixscale.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Matrixscale.com page load time and found that the first response time was 80 ms and then it took 543 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

matrixscale.com performance score

97

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.3 s

98/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

90/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.0 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.3 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

matrixscale.com

80 ms

xsp_styles.css

24 ms

INFO_BAR_MENU.css

44 ms

LEFT_MENU.css

45 ms

milonic_src.js

49 ms

Our browser made a total of 26 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Matrixscale.com, 4% (1 request) were made to Mycounter.tinycounter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (199 ms) relates to the external source Mycounter.tinycounter.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 47.2 kB (20%)

Content Size

239.4 kB

After Optimization

192.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Matrixscale.com main page is 239.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 166.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 43.2 kB

  • Original 49.6 kB
  • After minification 49.2 kB
  • After compression 6.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 43.2 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.4 kB

  • Original 166.9 kB
  • After minification 164.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Matrix Scale images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 1.3 kB

  • Original 20.5 kB
  • After minification 20.5 kB
  • After compression 19.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 349 B

  • Original 2.5 kB
  • After minification 2.5 kB
  • After compression 2.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Matrixscale.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 349 B or 14% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (17%)

Requests Now

24

After Optimization

20

The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Matrix Scale. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

matrixscale.com accessibility score

54

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

High

<object> elements do not have alternate text

Best Practices

matrixscale.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

matrixscale.com SEO score

64

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Document uses plugins

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Matrixscale.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Matrixscale.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Matrix Scale. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: