Tools & Wizards About Us
matthewsmarking.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 21

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    39% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 79% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

matthewsmarking.com

Coding & Marking Systems | Matthews Marking Systems

Page Load Speed

2.5 sec in total

First Response

61 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

280 ms

matthewsmarking.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to matthewsmarking.com homepage info - get ready to check Matthews Marking best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about matthewsmarking.com

Ultra reliable marking systems for product ID, packaging, and pallets. Whatever you need to mark on, we make it possible.

Visit matthewsmarking.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Matthewsmarking.com page load time and found that the first response time was 61 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

matthewsmarking.com performance score

21

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

22/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.4 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.3 s

19/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,990 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.027

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value23.6 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

matthewsmarking.com

61 ms

matthewsmarking.com

1011 ms

j.php

427 ms

all.min.css

16 ms

bootstrap.min.css

37 ms

Our browser made a total of 93 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (79 requests) were addressed to the original Matthewsmarking.com, 8% (7 requests) were made to Fast.wistia.net and 1% (1 request) were made to Dev.visualwebsiteoptimizer.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Matthewsmarking.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 183.5 kB (14%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Matthewsmarking.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 810.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 117.3 kB

  • Original 150.9 kB
  • After minification 150.8 kB
  • After compression 33.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 117.3 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 964 B

  • Original 158.1 kB
  • After minification 157.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Matthews Marking images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 65.0 kB

  • Original 810.9 kB
  • After minification 810.9 kB
  • After compression 745.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 225 B

  • Original 159.7 kB
  • After minification 159.7 kB
  • After compression 159.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Matthewsmarking.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 57 (67%)

Requests Now

85

After Optimization

28

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 85 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Matthews Marking. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 43 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

matthewsmarking.com

matthewsmarking.com

61 ms

matthewsmarking.com

matthewsmarking.com

1011 ms

j.php

j.php

427 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

16 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

37 ms

front.css

front.css

33 ms

twenty20.css

twenty20.css

35 ms

cookieblocker.min.css

cookieblocker.min.css

36 ms

style.css

style.css

41 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

44 ms

genericons.css

genericons.css

45 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

53 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

55 ms

slick.css

slick.css

58 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.css

jquery.fancybox.min.css

58 ms

style.css

style.css

64 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

59 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

86 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

63 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

88 ms

front.js

front.js

97 ms

jquery.ui.js

jquery.ui.js

93 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

94 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.js

jquery.fancybox.min.js

94 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

93 ms

E-v1.js

E-v1.js

36 ms

basic.min.css

basic.min.css

145 ms

theme-ie11.min.css

theme-ie11.min.css

92 ms

theme.min.css

theme.min.css

93 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

144 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

154 ms

jquery.form.min.js

jquery.form.min.js

206 ms

jquery.twenty20.js

jquery.twenty20.js

209 ms

jquery.event.move.js

jquery.event.move.js

207 ms

hoverIntent.min.js

hoverIntent.min.js

207 ms

maxmegamenu.js

maxmegamenu.js

211 ms

public.js

public.js

208 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

215 ms

api.js

api.js

53 ms

vcd15cbe7772f49c399c6a5babf22c1241717689176015

vcd15cbe7772f49c399c6a5babf22c1241717689176015

90 ms

complianz.min.js

complianz.min.js

212 ms

dom-ready.min.js

dom-ready.min.js

198 ms

a11y.min.js

a11y.min.js

191 ms

jquery.json.min.js

jquery.json.min.js

185 ms

gravityforms.min.js

gravityforms.min.js

184 ms

conditional_logic.min.js

conditional_logic.min.js

185 ms

jquery.textareaCounter.plugin.min.js

jquery.textareaCounter.plugin.min.js

187 ms

jquery.maskedinput.min.js

jquery.maskedinput.min.js

186 ms

placeholders.jquery.min.js

placeholders.jquery.min.js

186 ms

utils.min.js

utils.min.js

175 ms

vendor-theme.min.js

vendor-theme.min.js

177 ms

scripts-theme.min.js

scripts-theme.min.js

171 ms

akismet-frontend.js

akismet-frontend.js

182 ms

p9zs2ubkla

p9zs2ubkla

103 ms

product_catalog_hero.webp

product_catalog_hero.webp

104 ms

global.webp

global.webp

103 ms

search.webp

search.webp

103 ms

matthews_marking.webp

matthews_marking.webp

105 ms

IMG_4270.webp

IMG_4270.webp

104 ms

L1-singel_02_500x450.webp

L1-singel_02_500x450.webp

108 ms

matthews-marking-systems-marking-and-coding_560x560.png

matthews-marking-systems-marking-and-coding_560x560.png

108 ms

engineered-wood-64f0e6f663515.webp

engineered-wood-64f0e6f663515.webp

106 ms

istockphoto-1169668336-612x612-1.jpg

istockphoto-1169668336-612x612-1.jpg

107 ms

mms-products-overview-marking-and-labeling-cardboard-box-600w.webp

mms-products-overview-marking-and-labeling-cardboard-box-600w.webp

109 ms

testimonials.webp

testimonials.webp

108 ms

matthewsmarking.com

matthewsmarking.com

956 ms

prev-gray.png

prev-gray.png

110 ms

next-gray.png

next-gray.png

99 ms

pattern.png

pattern.png

98 ms

Lato-Regular.ttf

Lato-Regular.ttf

97 ms

Lato-Thin.ttf

Lato-Thin.ttf

145 ms

Lato-Light.ttf

Lato-Light.ttf

145 ms

Lato-Bold.ttf

Lato-Bold.ttf

143 ms

Lato-Black.ttf

Lato-Black.ttf

144 ms

pattern-left.png

pattern-left.png

143 ms

MMS_PortfolioOverview_MPERIA_Aug2024_648x480_V2.webp

MMS_PortfolioOverview_MPERIA_Aug2024_648x480_V2.webp

141 ms

2d-hero-featured-image.webp

2d-hero-featured-image.webp

201 ms

Citrus-Case-Study-Thumbnail.jpg

Citrus-Case-Study-Thumbnail.jpg

141 ms

mms-secondary-packaging-ebook-cover_640x460.webp

mms-secondary-packaging-ebook-cover_640x460.webp

200 ms

Contact_us_smiling-lady.jpg

Contact_us_smiling-lady.jpg

198 ms

linkedin.webp

linkedin.webp

197 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

196 ms

facebook-green.webp

facebook-green.webp

194 ms

youtube.webp

youtube.webp

195 ms

iframeApi.js

iframeApi.js

159 ms

main.js

main.js

57 ms

insideIframe.js

insideIframe.js

52 ms

wARDj0u

wARDj0u

50 ms

flashPlayer.js

flashPlayer.js

5 ms

googleAnalytics4.js

googleAnalytics4.js

9 ms

customerLogo.js

customerLogo.js

30 ms

js

js

62 ms

mput

mput

81 ms

Accessibility Review

matthewsmarking.com accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

matthewsmarking.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

matthewsmarking.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Matthewsmarking.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Matthewsmarking.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

matthewsmarking.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Matthews Marking. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: