71.8 sec in total
4.2 sec
23.1 sec
44.4 sec
Click here to check amazing Mattressreviewer content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about mattressreviewer.com
The Best Unbiased Mattress Reviews
Visit mattressreviewer.comWe analyzed Mattressreviewer.com page load time and found that the first response time was 4.2 sec and then it took 67.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.
mattressreviewer.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.2 s
78/100
10%
Value15.0 s
0/100
25%
Value5.9 s
48/100
10%
Value1,150 ms
22/100
30%
Value0.031
100/100
15%
Value19.6 s
2/100
10%
4211 ms
512 ms
118 ms
134 ms
116 ms
Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Mattressreviewer.com, 7% (3 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to S.ytimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.8 sec) relates to the external source Static.doubleclick.net.
Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (30%)
4.4 MB
3.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Mattressreviewer.com main page is 4.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 39.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 39.0 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 222.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mattressreviewer images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 513.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 513.6 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 557.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mattressreviewer.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 557.4 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (56%)
41
18
The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mattressreviewer. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
mattressreviewer.com
4211 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
512 ms
css
118 ms
bootstrap.min.css
134 ms
font-awesome.min.css
116 ms
style.css
315 ms
jquery.js
311 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
313 ms
highlight.pack.js
287 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
284 ms
bootstrap.min.js
251 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
440 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
441 ms
widgets.js
249 ms
main.js
440 ms
wp-embed.min.js
440 ms
flexslider.css
109 ms
magnific-popup.css
103 ms
monokai_sublime.css
277 ms
screen.css
94 ms
UDFg0ldkyyA
2233 ms
mattress-reviews-logo1.png
2084 ms
how-to-sleep-fast.png
2083 ms
top-8-best-mattresses-680x450.png
2042 ms
how-to-shop-for-a-mattress-680x450.png
2042 ms
twilight-bed-theme-680x450.png
2041 ms
how-to-clean-mattresses.png
2083 ms
best-thermostat-logo-680x450.png
2356 ms
bed-in-a-box-review-iamge-680x379.jpg
2355 ms
sleep-number-bed-review-680x450.png
2356 ms
best-mattress-reviews-680x450.jpg
2355 ms
www-player-vflMqr8uC.css
1038 ms
www-embed-player.js
414 ms
base.js
2654 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1404 ms
sdk.js
2347 ms
id
3784 ms
YubHWiCUdycrt9r0pwxtCFMvWBBxMHmgtw0lFaZzSbY.js
4328 ms
ad_status.js
4753 ms
4719 ms
0sTQzbapM8j.js
1609 ms
0sTQzbapM8j.js
2480 ms
logo_ringo-vflOpz8ZI.png
1083 ms
mattressreviewer.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
mattressreviewer.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
mattressreviewer.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mattressreviewer.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Mattressreviewer.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
mattressreviewer.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Mattressreviewer. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: