Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 64

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    24% of websites

mauge.net

www.mauge.net

Page Load Speed

9.4 sec in total

First Response

229 ms

Resources Loaded

9.1 sec

Page Rendered

133 ms

mauge.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to mauge.net homepage info - get ready to check Mauge best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about mauge.net

Visit mauge.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Mauge.net page load time and found that the first response time was 229 ms and then it took 9.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

mauge.net performance score

0

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.071

96/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

mauge.net

229 ms

htm.asp

178 ms

etusivu.asp

424 ms

windowsss.css

59 ms

urchin.js

18 ms

Our browser made a total of 120 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 17% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original Mauge.net, 25% (30 requests) were made to Resources.host.bannerflow.com and 8% (9 requests) were made to Html5.host.bannerflow.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.1 sec) relates to the external source Font.bannerflow.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 347.2 kB (38%)

Content Size

921.7 kB

After Optimization

574.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Mauge.net main page is 921.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 525.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-51%

Potential reduce by 295 B

  • Original 576 B
  • After minification 496 B
  • After compression 281 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 80 B, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 295 B or 51% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 77.1 kB

  • Original 525.1 kB
  • After minification 448.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Mauge needs image optimization as it can save up to 77.1 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 264.1 kB

  • Original 388.9 kB
  • After minification 366.3 kB
  • After compression 124.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 264.1 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 5.7 kB

  • Original 7.1 kB
  • After minification 5.7 kB
  • After compression 1.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mauge.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 5.7 kB or 80% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 45 (46%)

Requests Now

97

After Optimization

52

The browser has sent 97 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mauge. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

mauge.net accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

mauge.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

mauge.net SEO score

64

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mauge.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Mauge.net main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Mauge. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: