Tools & Wizards About Us
maultalk.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 56

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 63

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

maultalk.com

SEO MaulTalk.com

Page Load Speed

7.2 sec in total

First Response

203 ms

Resources Loaded

6.6 sec

Page Rendered

408 ms

maultalk.com screenshot

About Website

Visit maultalk.com now to see the best up-to-date Maul Talk content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about maultalk.com

MaulTalk - SEO , , .

Visit maultalk.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Maultalk.com page load time and found that the first response time was 203 ms and then it took 7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

maultalk.com performance score

56

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

21/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.8 s

15/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.5 s

38/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value240 ms

85/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.9 s

54/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

maultalk.com

203 ms

maultalk.com

462 ms

www.maultalk.com

906 ms

css_6.css

464 ms

responsivemobilemenu.css

471 ms

Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (62 requests) were addressed to the original Maultalk.com, 5% (4 requests) were made to Telegram.org and 4% (3 requests) were made to Mc.yandex.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Maultalk.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 154.8 kB (28%)

Content Size

545.4 kB

After Optimization

390.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Maultalk.com main page is 545.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 191.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 113.5 kB

  • Original 133.5 kB
  • After minification 124.4 kB
  • After compression 20.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 113.5 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 10.9 kB

  • Original 183.7 kB
  • After minification 172.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Maul Talk images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 23.1 kB

  • Original 191.9 kB
  • After minification 191.9 kB
  • After compression 168.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 23.1 kB or 12% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 7.3 kB

  • Original 36.3 kB
  • After minification 36.3 kB
  • After compression 29.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Maultalk.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 7.3 kB or 20% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 45 (63%)

Requests Now

72

After Optimization

27

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Maul Talk. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

maultalk.com

maultalk.com

203 ms

maultalk.com

maultalk.com

462 ms

www.maultalk.com

www.maultalk.com

906 ms

css_6.css

css_6.css

464 ms

responsivemobilemenu.css

responsivemobilemenu.css

471 ms

spoiler.css

spoiler.css

477 ms

int.css

int.css

484 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

21 ms

responsivemobilemenu.js

responsivemobilemenu.js

33 ms

styleswitcher.js

styleswitcher.js

447 ms

iepngfix_tilebg.js

iepngfix_tilebg.js

454 ms

ips_ipsclass.js

ips_ipsclass.js

872 ms

ipb_global.js

ipb_global.js

870 ms

ips_menu.js

ips_menu.js

893 ms

ips_menu_html.js

ips_menu_html.js

891 ms

lang_javascript.js

lang_javascript.js

901 ms

spoiler.js

spoiler.js

923 ms

get_code.php

get_code.php

237 ms

ips_xmlhttprequest.js

ips_xmlhttprequest.js

894 ms

ipb_global_xmlenhanced.js

ipb_global_xmlenhanced.js

1280 ms

dom-drag.js

dom-drag.js

1312 ms

get_code.php

get_code.php

359 ms

telegram-widget.js

telegram-widget.js

366 ms

ipb_forum.js

ipb_forum.js

1306 ms

background.gif

background.gif

778 ms

logo.gif

logo.gif

890 ms

loading_anim.gif

loading_anim.gif

817 ms

close.png

close.png

1205 ms

nav.gif

nav.gif

1187 ms

exp_plus.gif

exp_plus.gif

1198 ms

nav_m.gif

nav_m.gif

1203 ms

exp_minus.gif

exp_minus.gif

1207 ms

noavatar.png

noavatar.png

1317 ms

icon_1.gif

icon_1.gif

1706 ms

space.gif

space.gif

1631 ms

icon_2.gif

icon_2.gif

1632 ms

icon_3.gif

icon_3.gif

1630 ms

bf_new.gif

bf_new.gif

1642 ms

lastpost.gif

lastpost.gif

1763 ms

bc_new.gif

bc_new.gif

2051 ms

button.jpg

button.jpg

2040 ms

button.jpg

button.jpg

2070 ms

br_redirect.gif

br_redirect.gif

2053 ms

button.gif

button.gif

2182 ms

button.png

button.png

2185 ms

button.png

button.png

2465 ms

bf_readonly.gif

bf_readonly.gif

2483 ms

user.gif

user.gif

2474 ms

calen.gif

calen.gif

2491 ms

stats.gif

stats.gif

2627 ms

rss.png

rss.png

2186 ms

epicenter.jpg

epicenter.jpg

2471 ms

newheadbg.png

newheadbg.png

2427 ms

bg_left_png.png

bg_left_png.png

2429 ms

bg_right_new3.jpg

bg_right_new3.jpg

2534 ms

bg.jpg

bg.jpg

2508 ms

corners.gif

corners.gif

2577 ms

Untitled.png

Untitled.png

2480 ms

superheader9.png

superheader9.png

2523 ms

menu_item.gif

menu_item.gif

2426 ms

tg_btm.png

tg_btm.png

2503 ms

maultalkBot

maultalkBot

352 ms

tile_cat.jpg

tile_cat.jpg

2495 ms

hit

hit

511 ms

tag.js

tag.js

754 ms

font-roboto.css

font-roboto.css

82 ms

widget-frame.css

widget-frame.css

246 ms

widget-frame.js

widget-frame.js

405 ms

footer_bg_png.png

footer_bg_png.png

2380 ms

footer_bg.jpg

footer_bg.jpg

2428 ms

advert.gif

advert.gif

697 ms

sync_cookie_image_decide

sync_cookie_image_decide

152 ms

1

1

142 ms

resp_new.css

resp_new.css

473 ms

nomob.css

nomob.css

396 ms

Accessibility Review

maultalk.com accessibility score

63

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

maultalk.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

maultalk.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    WINDOWS-1251

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Maultalk.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Maultalk.com main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1251. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

maultalk.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Maul Talk. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: