Tools & Wizards About Us
maxclix.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 23

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    41% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

maxclix.com

Home - MAXCLIX Home - SEO Management & Digital Marketing

Page Load Speed

5.3 sec in total

First Response

1.1 sec

Resources Loaded

3.6 sec

Page Rendered

521 ms

maxclix.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to maxclix.com homepage info - get ready to check MAXCLIX best content right away, or after learning these important things about maxclix.com

Home - Maxclix - SEO Management & Digital Marketing Made Easy. Rank higher, earn more qualified traffic, & increase your bottom line with our managed services.

Visit maxclix.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Maxclix.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

maxclix.com performance score

23

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.9 s

4/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.6 s

8/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.0 s

9/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,580 ms

12/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.6 s

14/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.maxclix.com

1138 ms

autoptimize_23fd8ee817be31f4ee9cc88b5ec209a0.css

201 ms

css2

31 ms

autoptimize_single_bbbe33fc8cb26c1713f61cf273da00bc.css

185 ms

autoptimize_single_3cfcf42840e7f3427469bd6d8a59e92c.css

187 ms

Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Maxclix.com, 15% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Maxclix.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 466.3 kB (34%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

917.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Maxclix.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 659.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 181.3 kB

  • Original 208.2 kB
  • After minification 208.1 kB
  • After compression 26.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 181.3 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 46.0 kB

  • Original 659.7 kB
  • After minification 613.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. MAXCLIX images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 77 B

  • Original 267.5 kB
  • After minification 267.5 kB
  • After compression 267.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-96%

Potential reduce by 238.9 kB

  • Original 247.9 kB
  • After minification 9.1 kB
  • After compression 9.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Maxclix.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 238.9 kB or 96% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (45%)

Requests Now

22

After Optimization

12

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of MAXCLIX. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.maxclix.com

www.maxclix.com

1138 ms

autoptimize_23fd8ee817be31f4ee9cc88b5ec209a0.css

autoptimize_23fd8ee817be31f4ee9cc88b5ec209a0.css

201 ms

css2

css2

31 ms

autoptimize_single_bbbe33fc8cb26c1713f61cf273da00bc.css

autoptimize_single_bbbe33fc8cb26c1713f61cf273da00bc.css

185 ms

autoptimize_single_3cfcf42840e7f3427469bd6d8a59e92c.css

autoptimize_single_3cfcf42840e7f3427469bd6d8a59e92c.css

187 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

188 ms

js

js

59 ms

lazysizes.min.js

lazysizes.min.js

185 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

185 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

341 ms

autoptimize_4e35161c38e2383138b55cad398bb1e3.js

autoptimize_4e35161c38e2383138b55cad398bb1e3.js

543 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

197 ms

css

css

167 ms

logo-dark.svg

logo-dark.svg

178 ms

Home-Page-Header-Background-RESIZED-scaled.webp

Home-Page-Header-Background-RESIZED-scaled.webp

360 ms

Blog-Page-Header-Background-RESIZED2.jpg

Blog-Page-Header-Background-RESIZED2.jpg

456 ms

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-B4i1UA.ttf

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-B4i1UA.ttf

184 ms

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-NYi1UA.ttf

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-NYi1UA.ttf

286 ms

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-2Y-1UA.ttf

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-2Y-1UA.ttf

338 ms

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-4I-1UA.ttf

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-4I-1UA.ttf

340 ms

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-h4-1UA.ttf

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-h4-1UA.ttf

341 ms

MaxClix-Logo-Full-Org-1024x1024.png

MaxClix-Logo-Full-Org-1024x1024.png

209 ms

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-B4iFV0Uw.ttf

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-B4iFV0Uw.ttf

147 ms

PS-Bold.woff

PS-Bold.woff

200 ms

themify.woff

themify.woff

200 ms

themify.woff

themify.woff

200 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

241 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

243 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

243 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

244 ms

flaticon.svg

flaticon.svg

400 ms

flaticon.woff

flaticon.woff

296 ms

flaticon.svg

flaticon.svg

298 ms

flaticon.woff

flaticon.woff

297 ms

PAJJhLM6sSoWKfWCAAwDAjgbRAAB42mNgYGBkAIIbCZo5IPrmUn0hGA0AO8EFTQAA

PAJJhLM6sSoWKfWCAAwDAjgbRAAB42mNgYGBkAIIbCZo5IPrmUn0hGA0AO8EFTQAA

35 ms

Contact_Banner-scaled.webp

Contact_Banner-scaled.webp

200 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

208 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

260 ms

banner-img2.png

banner-img2.png

358 ms

MaxClix_logo_light_UPDATE.svg

MaxClix_logo_light_UPDATE.svg

66 ms

Home_page_computer_image_-_RESIZED.webp

Home_page_computer_image_-_RESIZED.webp

65 ms

Accessibility Review

maxclix.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

maxclix.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

maxclix.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Maxclix.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Maxclix.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

maxclix.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of MAXCLIX. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: