3.8 sec in total
266 ms
2.7 sec
916 ms
Click here to check amazing Maximum content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about maximum.pl
Projektujemy i tworzymy strony internetowe Kielce, sklepy internetowe, aplikacje dedykowane. Od 2000 roku świadczymy kompleksowe usługi w zakresie IT.
Visit maximum.plWe analyzed Maximum.pl page load time and found that the first response time was 266 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
maximum.pl performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.6 s
14/100
10%
Value8.1 s
2/100
25%
Value8.1 s
21/100
10%
Value3,610 ms
1/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value9.1 s
33/100
10%
266 ms
618 ms
118 ms
232 ms
438 ms
Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (52 requests) were addressed to the original Maximum.pl, 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Maximum.pl.
Page size can be reduced by 212.9 kB (34%)
625.7 kB
412.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Maximum.pl main page is 625.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 297.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 146.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 146.2 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 127 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Maximum images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 14.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 51.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Maximum.pl needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 51.6 kB or 17% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (92%)
50
4
The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Maximum. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
maximum.pl
266 ms
maximum.pl
618 ms
reset.min.css
118 ms
bootstrap.min.css
232 ms
lfb_flat-ui_frontend.min.css
438 ms
dropzone.min.css
332 ms
lfb_colpick.min.css
354 ms
font-awesome.min.css
343 ms
lfb_forms.min.css
460 ms
style.min.css
347 ms
styles.css
456 ms
js_composer.min.css
490 ms
ave-core.min.css
475 ms
liquid-icon.min.css
483 ms
font-awesome.min.css
614 ms
bootstrap.min.css
617 ms
jquery-ui.css
624 ms
fresco.css
621 ms
lity.min.css
621 ms
flickity.min.css
625 ms
style.css
645 ms
theme.min.css
766 ms
style.css
674 ms
liquid-css-3994.css
673 ms
liquid-responsive-100.css
678 ms
animate.min.css
663 ms
index.js
726 ms
api.js
42 ms
index.js
987 ms
fresco.js
987 ms
lity.min.js
987 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
988 ms
SplitText.min.js
988 ms
particles.min.js
988 ms
vc-waypoints.min.js
1042 ms
vivus.min.js
1042 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
1042 ms
packery-mode.pkgd.min.js
1041 ms
css
43 ms
flickity.pkgd.min.js
1040 ms
bootstrap.min.js
961 ms
intersection-observer.js
903 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
812 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
791 ms
anime.min.js
790 ms
ScrollMagic.min.js
790 ms
fontfaceobserver.js
851 ms
lazyload.min.js
843 ms
tinycolor-min.js
840 ms
theme.min.js
873 ms
maximum-logo-2-1-1.png
828 ms
maximum-logo-1-1-1.png
705 ms
bg-min.png
217 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf
30 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf
75 ms
liquid-icon.woff
639 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
503 ms
maximum.pl accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
maximum.pl best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
maximum.pl SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
PL
PL
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Maximum.pl can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Polish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Maximum.pl main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
maximum.pl
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Maximum. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: