7.3 sec in total
527 ms
2.7 sec
4.1 sec
Click here to check amazing Mcvm content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about mcvm.in
Visit mcvm.inWe analyzed Mcvm.in page load time and found that the first response time was 527 ms and then it took 6.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
mcvm.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.7 s
13/100
10%
Value24.0 s
0/100
25%
Value14.3 s
1/100
10%
Value4,310 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.727
6/100
15%
Value21.0 s
1/100
10%
527 ms
208 ms
160 ms
160 ms
169 ms
Our browser made a total of 83 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (71 requests) were addressed to the original Mcvm.in, 8% (7 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Maps.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Mcvm.in.
Page size can be reduced by 627.9 kB (12%)
5.1 MB
4.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Mcvm.in main page is 5.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 4.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 47.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 22.7 kB, which is 42% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 47.1 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mcvm images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 308.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 308.3 kB or 56% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 269.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mcvm.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 269.2 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (43%)
75
43
The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mcvm. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
mcvm.in
527 ms
bootstrap.min.css
208 ms
font-awesome.min.css
160 ms
jquery.simpleTicker.css
160 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
169 ms
owl.theme.default.css
166 ms
animate.css
152 ms
prettyPhoto.css
214 ms
style.css
228 ms
responsive.css
220 ms
css
50 ms
jquery.min.js
288 ms
jquery.validate.js
262 ms
additional-methods.js
270 ms
bootstrap.min.js
278 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
491 ms
app.js
258 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js.js
482 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
484 ms
jquery.waypoints.min.js
485 ms
jquery.counterup.min.js
487 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
489 ms
jquery.simpleTicker.js
490 ms
jquery.sticky.js
493 ms
wow.js
495 ms
jquery.goole-map.js
496 ms
main.js
499 ms
logo.png
210 ms
9bd36600a733c92beeca2a2ee8e12507.jpg
855 ms
0d3c093a0195518e55b2f6af3fc54015.jpg
857 ms
e46cc6fa9357425e256513f9c51c5e5a.jpg
855 ms
line-bg.png
207 ms
0007f81b880e0254c870596b7ebd872a.jpg
674 ms
032987579be17e3c99e4798d319e75b2.jpg
680 ms
971dc940f307fd5a7a3f0c15a317fda9.jpg
687 ms
parallax.jpg
679 ms
line-bg-white.png
698 ms
13477ce466fd01672ac85bd8ef823c78.jpg
709 ms
b96c511a33c0b9993fde791cb9a3baa5.jpg
698 ms
42d9717ea3f5341ca04a14d3dd829870.jpg
726 ms
9437021883a41edbf09cd811a8a70cb1.jpg
1085 ms
800-x-500px_12.png
1085 ms
800-x-500px_11.png
874 ms
800-x-500px_10.png
862 ms
800-x-500px_9.png
860 ms
800-x-500px_8.png
871 ms
800-x-500px_7.png
1103 ms
800-x-500px_6.png
1085 ms
800-x-500px_5.png
1087 ms
800-x-500px_4.png
1103 ms
800-x-500px_3.png
1171 ms
800-x-500px_2.png
1075 ms
800-x-500px_1.png
1075 ms
gl8.jpg
1072 ms
gl7.jpg
1070 ms
gl6.jpg
1069 ms
gl5.jpg
1132 ms
gl4.jpg
1131 ms
gl3.jpg
1126 ms
gl2.jpg
1130 ms
gl1.jpg
1128 ms
dd4a6deff02bd5ead376eebdf1bddfac.jpg
1123 ms
Roboto-Regular.ttf
1393 ms
embed
532 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1317 ms
Roboto-Medium.ttf
1319 ms
js
65 ms
Roboto-Bold.ttf
848 ms
7177518ea0c09d169fc41c3c1ed3686b.jpg
843 ms
bf55894841ecc92d3f765c29d2f7c192.jpg
839 ms
0887bbccfccccc3618fc144fe7dd81b7.jpg
830 ms
e1c13382859130a29d1c27f6bdbd88ee.jpg
830 ms
564351bdc8a061bb5979de61c7aae1ed.jpg
823 ms
30e06f4a5f4645fa107dbdf9c43aa7de.png
804 ms
init_embed.js
50 ms
common.js
123 ms
util.js
182 ms
map.js
185 ms
google4.png
99 ms
overlay.js
96 ms
onion.js
58 ms
search_impl.js
58 ms
openhand_8_8.cur
229 ms
mcvm.in accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
mcvm.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
mcvm.in SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mcvm.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mcvm.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
mcvm.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Mcvm. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: