Tools & Wizards About Us
me.lk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 22

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    40% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 91% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

me.lk

Maharaja Entertainments

Page Load Speed

13.8 sec in total

First Response

46 ms

Resources Loaded

13.4 sec

Page Rendered

428 ms

me.lk screenshot

About Website

Visit me.lk now to see the best up-to-date Me content for Sri Lanka and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about me.lk

Maharaja Entertainments (Private) Limited was born out of a vision to bring legitimacy to the music business in Sri Lanka and gain ‘ear’ share through a wide repertoire of original titles in various l...

Visit me.lk

Key Findings

We analyzed Me.lk page load time and found that the first response time was 46 ms and then it took 13.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

me.lk performance score

22

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.5 s

96/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.3 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.5 s

27/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,860 ms

9/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1.116

1/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.2 s

62/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

me.lk

46 ms

me.lk

2683 ms

ME%20LOGO%20LESS%20WHITE%20BK_1.png

623 ms

Sandawahiye%202.webp

1477 ms

Suranganawee.webp

2787 ms

Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 12% of them (9 requests) were addressed to the original Me.lk, 88% (64 requests) were made to Storage.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (7.3 sec) relates to the external source Storage.googleapis.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 260.6 kB (8%)

Content Size

3.4 MB

After Optimization

3.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Me.lk main page is 3.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 105.4 kB

  • Original 119.7 kB
  • After minification 119.7 kB
  • After compression 14.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 105.4 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 155.2 kB

  • Original 3.3 MB
  • After minification 3.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Me images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 17 B

  • Original 655 B
  • After minification 655 B
  • After compression 638 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (12%)

Requests Now

42

After Optimization

37

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Me. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

me.lk

me.lk

46 ms

me.lk

me.lk

2683 ms

ME%20LOGO%20LESS%20WHITE%20BK_1.png

ME%20LOGO%20LESS%20WHITE%20BK_1.png

623 ms

Sandawahiye%202.webp

Sandawahiye%202.webp

1477 ms

Suranganawee.webp

Suranganawee.webp

2787 ms

Heena%20-%20%20Web%20Banner.webp

Heena%20-%20%20Web%20Banner.webp

1549 ms

Mal%20Osariya%20WEB%20slider.jpg

Mal%20Osariya%20WEB%20slider.jpg

2933 ms

Gini%20Pimbina%20makara.jpg

Gini%20Pimbina%20makara.jpg

3545 ms

Nilnuwan.png

Nilnuwan.png

3433 ms

Asipiya%20Salena%20Nisa.jpg

Asipiya%20Salena%20Nisa.jpg

3270 ms

Sulaga%20Wage.png

Sulaga%20Wage.png

5001 ms

instawhite.png

instawhite.png

3364 ms

tiktokwhite%402x.png

tiktokwhite%402x.png

3199 ms

youtubewhite.svg

youtubewhite.svg

3771 ms

fbwhite.svg

fbwhite.svg

3511 ms

applemusicwhite.svg

applemusicwhite.svg

4670 ms

spotifywhite.svg

spotifywhite.svg

3698 ms

Colored_Full_Black%402x%402x.png

Colored_Full_Black%402x%402x.png

4074 ms

amazonwhite.svg

amazonwhite.svg

3833 ms

1.webp

1.webp

5362 ms

9.webp

9.webp

5938 ms

14.webp

14.webp

4196 ms

16.webp

16.webp

4411 ms

Nim%20Him%20Sewwa.webp

Nim%20Him%20Sewwa.webp

5625 ms

Amathaka%20Karanan%20Epa.webp

Amathaka%20Karanan%20Epa.webp

6321 ms

Nopenene%20Se.webp

Nopenene%20Se.webp

6182 ms

2.webp

2.webp

5313 ms

3.webp

3.webp

6892 ms

4.webp

4.webp

6210 ms

5.webp

5.webp

6165 ms

6.webp

6.webp

6279 ms

7.webp

7.webp

6482 ms

104.Namal%20mitak.webp

104.Namal%20mitak.webp

6535 ms

137.Paramee.webp

137.Paramee.webp

6485 ms

198.Unuhuma.webp

198.Unuhuma.webp

6809 ms

206.Arabiya.webp

206.Arabiya.webp

6616 ms

226.Raj%60s%20Sanda%20Mithuri.webp

226.Raj%60s%20Sanda%20Mithuri.webp

7284 ms

24.Urumaya.webp

24.Urumaya.webp

6798 ms

runtime.8953013108cdbe8b.js

runtime.8953013108cdbe8b.js

336 ms

polyfills.e8c48ad143a2c732.js

polyfills.e8c48ad143a2c732.js

1525 ms

scripts.d1c00555d4694195.js

scripts.d1c00555d4694195.js

1170 ms

main.dc32685b989ca229.js

main.dc32685b989ca229.js

1907 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

15 ms

242.Landu.webp

242.Landu.webp

6387 ms

main.js

main.js

9 ms

246.Photographic%20Breath%20(1).webp

246.Photographic%20Breath%20(1).webp

5561 ms

252.Punchi%20kude.webp

252.Punchi%20kude.webp

5763 ms

styles.aa2600dc6caeca26.css

styles.aa2600dc6caeca26.css

1136 ms

275.Koththamalli.webp

275.Koththamalli.webp

4478 ms

33.Rising%20From%20The%20East.webp

33.Rising%20From%20The%20East.webp

4366 ms

40.Samaya.webp

40.Samaya.webp

4929 ms

42.Thilaka%20Thiyanna.webp

42.Thilaka%20Thiyanna.webp

4106 ms

43.Dreamz%20Of%20Shihan.webp

43.Dreamz%20Of%20Shihan.webp

5492 ms

52.Sandawathuren.webp

52.Sandawathuren.webp

4191 ms

66.Infaas.webp

66.Infaas.webp

4368 ms

116.Clarence%20Nonstop.webp

116.Clarence%20Nonstop.webp

4666 ms

70.Aloke.webp

70.Aloke.webp

3976 ms

135.Wahi%20Pabalu_Surendra%20Perera.webp

135.Wahi%20Pabalu_Surendra%20Perera.webp

4155 ms

181.Tribute%20To%20Walley%20Bastianz.webp

181.Tribute%20To%20Walley%20Bastianz.webp

5471 ms

136.Aadambarakari.webp

136.Aadambarakari.webp

4748 ms

18.Neththra.webp

18.Neththra.webp

4040 ms

139.Mathakayan.webp

139.Mathakayan.webp

4122 ms

16.Iraj.webp

16.Iraj.webp

3858 ms

Me%20PNG%20Balck%201.png

Me%20PNG%20Balck%201.png

3844 ms

Image%20What%20we%20Offer%402x.png

Image%20What%20we%20Offer%402x.png

4515 ms

1.webp

1.webp

3548 ms

7.webp

7.webp

3544 ms

2.webp

2.webp

3321 ms

3.webp

3.webp

3035 ms

4.webp

4.webp

3933 ms

5.webp

5.webp

3353 ms

6.webp

6.webp

3572 ms

ME%20LOGO%20LESS%20WHITE%20BK.png

ME%20LOGO%20LESS%20WHITE%20BK.png

4482 ms

Accessibility Review

me.lk accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

me.lk best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

me.lk SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Me.lk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Me.lk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

me.lk

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Me. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: