Report Summary

  • 11

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    24% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

mecenova.org

mécénova | mécénat performant, partenariats innovants

Page Load Speed

1.6 sec in total

First Response

180 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

161 ms

mecenova.org screenshot

About Website

Welcome to mecenova.org homepage info - get ready to check Mecenova best content for France right away, or after learning these important things about mecenova.org

Sur mécénova retrouvez toute l'actualité du mécénat performant et des partenariats innovants by Les entreprises pour la Cité

Visit mecenova.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Mecenova.org page load time and found that the first response time was 180 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

mecenova.org performance score

11

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

10/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value28.4 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value6,290 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.182

67/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value25.8 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

mecenova.org

180 ms

www.mecenova.org

303 ms

styles.css

82 ms

protoculous.js

248 ms

functions.js

158 ms

Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (31 requests) were addressed to the original Mecenova.org, 6% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (351 ms) belongs to the original domain Mecenova.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 226.8 kB (52%)

Content Size

438.2 kB

After Optimization

211.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Mecenova.org main page is 438.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 245.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 12.7 kB

  • Original 17.5 kB
  • After minification 16.9 kB
  • After compression 4.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 12.7 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 11.8 kB

  • Original 121.9 kB
  • After minification 110.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mecenova images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 158.7 kB

  • Original 245.8 kB
  • After minification 242.3 kB
  • After compression 87.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 158.7 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 43.6 kB

  • Original 52.9 kB
  • After minification 41.2 kB
  • After compression 9.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mecenova.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 43.6 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (29%)

Requests Now

31

After Optimization

22

The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mecenova. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

mecenova.org accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

mecenova.org best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

mecenova.org SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    FR

  • Language Claimed

    FR

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mecenova.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mecenova.org main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Mecenova. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: