Report Summary

  • 42

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    61% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 57% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

meda.com

Meda | Home

Page Load Speed

703 ms in total

First Response

171 ms

Resources Loaded

405 ms

Page Rendered

127 ms

meda.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to meda.com homepage info - get ready to check Meda best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about meda.com

Precision handheld and benchtop fluxgate and induction (search) coil magnetometers.

Visit meda.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Meda.com page load time and found that the first response time was 171 ms and then it took 532 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

meda.com performance score

42

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value9.4 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.9 s

10/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value290 ms

79/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.1 s

20/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

meda.com

171 ms

homeban.gif

62 ms

about.gif

62 ms

products.gif

60 ms

catalog.gif

84 ms

Our browser made a total of 18 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original Meda.com, 17% (3 requests) were made to Sitelevel.com and 6% (1 request) were made to Intra.whatuseek.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (253 ms) belongs to the original domain Meda.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 9.7 kB (14%)

Content Size

67.6 kB

After Optimization

57.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Meda.com main page is 67.6 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 57.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 5.7 kB

  • Original 8.8 kB
  • After minification 8.1 kB
  • After compression 3.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 5.7 kB or 66% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 3.2 kB

  • Original 57.5 kB
  • After minification 54.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Meda images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-56%

Potential reduce by 707 B

  • Original 1.3 kB
  • After minification 1.2 kB
  • After compression 563 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 707 B or 56% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-35%

Potential reduce by 24 B

  • Original 68 B
  • After minification 61 B
  • After compression 44 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Meda.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 24 B or 35% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

15

After Optimization

15

The browser has sent 15 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Meda. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

meda.com accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

meda.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

meda.com SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Meda.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Meda.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Meda. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: