Tools & Wizards About Us
medesignconstruction.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 43

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    62% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 80

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    42% of websites

medesignconstruction.com

ME Design and Construction. Northwest Indiana's premier Remodeling Contractor

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

333 ms

Resources Loaded

988 ms

Page Rendered

214 ms

medesignconstruction.com screenshot

About Website

Visit medesignconstruction.com now to see the best up-to-date Me Design Construction content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about medesignconstruction.com

ME Design and Construction. Northwest Indiana's Kitchen remodeling, bath remodeling, basement finishing, design remodeling, home addition, and garage contractor.

Visit medesignconstruction.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Medesignconstruction.com page load time and found that the first response time was 333 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

medesignconstruction.com performance score

43

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

20/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.6 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.0 s

32/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value240 ms

85/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.275

44/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.3 s

49/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

medesignconstruction.com

333 ms

css

21 ms

css

41 ms

bootstrap.min.css

113 ms

joomla-fontawesome.min.css

155 ms

Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Medesignconstruction.com, 16% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (333 ms) belongs to the original domain Medesignconstruction.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 168.0 kB (16%)

Content Size

1.0 MB

After Optimization

856.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Medesignconstruction.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 853.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 24.8 kB

  • Original 31.8 kB
  • After minification 31.0 kB
  • After compression 7.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.8 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 140.7 kB

  • Original 853.8 kB
  • After minification 713.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Me Design Construction needs image optimization as it can save up to 140.7 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 1.8 kB

  • Original 79.4 kB
  • After minification 79.4 kB
  • After compression 77.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 732 B

  • Original 59.2 kB
  • After minification 59.2 kB
  • After compression 58.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Medesignconstruction.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (56%)

Requests Now

34

After Optimization

15

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Me Design Construction. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

medesignconstruction.com

medesignconstruction.com

333 ms

css

css

21 ms

css

css

41 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

113 ms

joomla-fontawesome.min.css

joomla-fontawesome.min.css

155 ms

font-awesome-v4-shims.min.css

font-awesome-v4-shims.min.css

111 ms

template.css

template.css

106 ms

preset1.css

preset1.css

103 ms

frontend-edit.css

frontend-edit.css

122 ms

convertforms.css

convertforms.css

160 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

217 ms

jquery-noconflict.js

jquery-noconflict.js

167 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

167 ms

bootstrap.legacy.js

bootstrap.legacy.js

167 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

212 ms

jquery.sticky.js

jquery.sticky.js

208 ms

main.js

main.js

212 ms

frontend-edit.js

frontend-edit.js

211 ms

core.js

core.js

214 ms

keepalive.js

keepalive.js

260 ms

site.js

site.js

265 ms

powr_joomla.js

powr_joomla.js

108 ms

me_logo9.png

me_logo9.png

57 ms

me_valpak_august_24_front.jpg

me_valpak_august_24_front.jpg

156 ms

me_kitchens3.jpg

me_kitchens3.jpg

207 ms

me_kitchens.jpg

me_kitchens.jpg

57 ms

ME_ROOFING.jpg

ME_ROOFING.jpg

115 ms

me_baths.jpg

me_baths.jpg

114 ms

ME_SIDING.jpg

ME_SIDING.jpg

114 ms

me_basements.jpg

me_basements.jpg

115 ms

ME_WINDOWS.jpg

ME_WINDOWS.jpg

159 ms

me_additions.jpg

me_additions.jpg

161 ms

ME_DOORS.jpg

ME_DOORS.jpg

165 ms

me_talk2-copy.png

me_talk2-copy.png

215 ms

me_logo20.png

me_logo20.png

209 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4saVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4saVQ.woff

36 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4saVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4saVQ.woff

66 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4saVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4saVQ.woff

74 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4saVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4saVQ.woff

74 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4saVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4saVQ.woff

74 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

262 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

268 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

215 ms

EJRSQgYoZZY2vCFuvAnt66qSVy0.woff

EJRSQgYoZZY2vCFuvAnt66qSVy0.woff

93 ms

EJRVQgYoZZY2vCFuvAFWzrk.woff

EJRVQgYoZZY2vCFuvAFWzrk.woff

99 ms

Accessibility Review

medesignconstruction.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

medesignconstruction.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

medesignconstruction.com SEO score

80

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Medesignconstruction.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Medesignconstruction.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

medesignconstruction.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Me Design Construction. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: