1.3 sec in total
103 ms
983 ms
236 ms
Click here to check amazing Media After content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about mediaafter.com
News and information in one place
Visit mediaafter.comWe analyzed Mediaafter.com page load time and found that the first response time was 103 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
mediaafter.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
43/100
10%
Value4.3 s
42/100
25%
Value13.8 s
1/100
10%
Value3,520 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.625
10/100
15%
Value17.6 s
4/100
10%
103 ms
146 ms
41 ms
46 ms
137 ms
Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 61% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Mediaafter.com, 25% (14 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (457 ms) relates to the external source Pagead2.googlesyndication.com.
Page size can be reduced by 109.8 kB (28%)
396.7 kB
286.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Mediaafter.com main page is 396.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 243.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 100.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 25.5 kB, which is 22% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 100.0 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Media After needs image optimization as it can save up to 7.7 kB or 21% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 2.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (82%)
39
7
The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Media After. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
mediaafter.com
103 ms
mediaafter.com
146 ms
style.min.css
41 ms
font-awesome.min.css
46 ms
bootstrap.min.css
137 ms
slick.min.css
70 ms
jquery.sidr.dark.css
97 ms
magnific-popup.css
48 ms
css
35 ms
style.css
114 ms
jquery.min.js
86 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
90 ms
js
69 ms
adsbygoogle.js
123 ms
navigation.js
98 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
121 ms
slick.min.js
122 ms
bootstrap.min.js
290 ms
jquery.sidr.min.js
129 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
288 ms
jquery.matchHeight.min.js
288 ms
jquery.marquee.js
296 ms
theia-sticky-sidebar.min.js
297 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
294 ms
masonry.min.js
296 ms
script.js
300 ms
fixed-header-script.js
296 ms
lazySizesConfig.js
298 ms
ls.unveilhooks.min.js
298 ms
ls.bgset.min.js
300 ms
lazysizes.min.js
300 ms
image.js
300 ms
lazyload.min.js
300 ms
sdk.bundle.min.js
195 ms
show_ads_impl.js
457 ms
zrt_lookup.html
135 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjxAwWA.woff
85 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwaPHw.woff
117 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwaPHw.woff
144 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwaPHw.woff
158 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
114 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1JlEw.woff
160 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1JlEw.woff
158 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1JlEw.woff
159 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJnedA.woff
158 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1JlEw.woff
157 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc-.woff
160 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fChc-.woff
160 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxM.woff
161 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fChc-.woff
161 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxGIzQ.woff
160 ms
app.min.js
150 ms
powered-by.svg
97 ms
cropped-mdiaafter_logo_h-2-e1676554406963.png
63 ms
cropped-728%D1%8590_ENG.png
62 ms
f7a69306e676490684e005c1b4163999.gif
174 ms
mediaafter.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
mediaafter.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
mediaafter.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mediaafter.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mediaafter.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
mediaafter.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Media After. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: