Tools & Wizards About Us
mediabak.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 95

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    93% of other websites

  • 63

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

mediabak.com

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

99 ms

Resources Loaded

730 ms

Page Rendered

699 ms

mediabak.com screenshot

About Website

Visit mediabak.com now to see the best up-to-date Mediabak content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about mediabak.com

Access Unlimited eBooks, Audiobooks from any device. Sign up today and gain instant access to a huge selection.

Visit mediabak.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Mediabak.com page load time and found that the first response time was 99 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

mediabak.com performance score

95

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.8 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0.8 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.7 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value150 ms

95/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.143

78/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.0 s

96/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

mediabak.com

99 ms

108 ms

main.css

52 ms

normalize.min.css

96 ms

style.css

95 ms

Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Mediabak.com, 8% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (293 ms) belongs to the original domain Mediabak.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 480.0 kB (23%)

Content Size

2.1 MB

After Optimization

1.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Mediabak.com main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 20.4 kB

  • Original 26.4 kB
  • After minification 25.3 kB
  • After compression 6.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 20.4 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 121.9 kB

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mediabak images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-60%

Potential reduce by 106.5 kB

  • Original 176.6 kB
  • After minification 173.6 kB
  • After compression 70.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 106.5 kB or 60% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 231.1 kB

  • Original 262.3 kB
  • After minification 225.5 kB
  • After compression 31.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mediabak.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 231.1 kB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (57%)

Requests Now

47

After Optimization

20

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 47 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mediabak. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

mediabak.com

mediabak.com

99 ms

108 ms

main.css

main.css

52 ms

normalize.min.css

normalize.min.css

96 ms

style.css

style.css

95 ms

audiobook_style.css

audiobook_style.css

96 ms

error.css

error.css

93 ms

css

css

69 ms

css

css

81 ms

css

css

95 ms

css

css

106 ms

jquery-2.1.3.js

jquery-2.1.3.js

133 ms

jquery-ui.css

jquery-ui.css

67 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

92 ms

jquery.remodal.css

jquery.remodal.css

101 ms

jquery.remodal.min.js

jquery.remodal.min.js

175 ms

audio.min.js

audio.min.js

176 ms

jquery.growl.css

jquery.growl.css

174 ms

jquery.growl.js

jquery.growl.js

173 ms

jquery.dotdotdot.min.js

jquery.dotdotdot.min.js

176 ms

modernizr-2.8.3-respond-1.4.2.min.js

modernizr-2.8.3-respond-1.4.2.min.js

178 ms

soundmanager2-nodebug-jsmin.js

soundmanager2-nodebug-jsmin.js

190 ms

bar-ui.js

bar-ui.js

190 ms

bar-ui.css

bar-ui.css

188 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

188 ms

51_main.css

51_main.css

200 ms

ac_additional.css

ac_additional.css

225 ms

select2.min.css

select2.min.css

284 ms

select2.min.js

select2.min.js

293 ms

main.js

main.js

291 ms

logo_at_100px.png

logo_at_100px.png

98 ms

device.png

device.png

99 ms

howitworks.svg

howitworks.svg

99 ms

howitworks.png

howitworks.png

102 ms

onthego.svg

onthego.svg

103 ms

onthego.png

onthego.png

116 ms

updatedlibrary.svg

updatedlibrary.svg

117 ms

updatedlibrary.png

updatedlibrary.png

119 ms

white-triangle-one.png

white-triangle-one.png

139 ms

white-triangle-two.png

white-triangle-two.png

140 ms

white-triangle-three.png

white-triangle-three.png

140 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

151 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

120 ms

4.jpg

4.jpg

169 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

146 ms

cvv.jpg

cvv.jpg

150 ms

icomoon.ttf

icomoon.ttf

83 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

24 ms

collect

collect

11 ms

collect

collect

8 ms

Accessibility Review

mediabak.com accessibility score

63

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

mediabak.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

mediabak.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mediabak.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Mediabak.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

mediabak.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Mediabak. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: