3 sec in total
335 ms
2.5 sec
163 ms
Welcome to mediaesthetics.org homepage info - get ready to check Mediaesthetics best content right away, or after learning these important things about mediaesthetics.org
mediaesthetics ist ein medienwissenschaftliches open-access Journal, das von der Kollegforschergruppe Cinepoetics an der FU Berlin herausgegeben wird und sich als eine Plattform für das Erproben genui...
Visit mediaesthetics.orgWe analyzed Mediaesthetics.org page load time and found that the first response time was 335 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
mediaesthetics.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.3 s
73/100
10%
Value10.3 s
0/100
25%
Value4.5 s
72/100
10%
Value50 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.188
65/100
15%
Value7.7 s
46/100
10%
335 ms
329 ms
124 ms
227 ms
309 ms
Our browser made a total of 15 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Mediaesthetics.org and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (930 ms) belongs to the original domain Mediaesthetics.org.
Page size can be reduced by 133.4 kB (15%)
894.4 kB
761.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Mediaesthetics.org main page is 894.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 747.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 10.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.4 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 10.3 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 121.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Mediaesthetics needs image optimization as it can save up to 121.3 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 1.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 430 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mediaesthetics.org has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (42%)
12
7
The browser has sent 12 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mediaesthetics. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
mediaesthetics.org
335 ms
mae
329 ms
css
124 ms
fontawesome.css
227 ms
styleSheet.css
309 ms
jquery.min.js
414 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
517 ms
popper.js
412 ms
util.js
328 ms
dropdown.js
330 ms
main.js
409 ms
pageHeaderLogoImage_en_US.png
612 ms
cover_issue_13_en_US.png
930 ms
ojs_brand.png
510 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
385 ms
mediaesthetics.org accessibility score
mediaesthetics.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
mediaesthetics.org SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mediaesthetics.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mediaesthetics.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
mediaesthetics.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Mediaesthetics. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: