2.1 sec in total
361 ms
1.6 sec
138 ms
Visit mediavilla.name now to see the best up-to-date Mediavilla content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about mediavilla.name
User experience and service designer.
Visit mediavilla.nameWe analyzed Mediavilla.name page load time and found that the first response time was 361 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
mediavilla.name performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
37/100
10%
Value3.4 s
67/100
25%
Value3.4 s
89/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.035
100/100
15%
Value3.4 s
93/100
10%
361 ms
75 ms
101 ms
57 ms
5 ms
Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 13% of them (6 requests) were addressed to the original Mediavilla.name, 53% (24 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 18% (8 requests) were made to Maps.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (361 ms) belongs to the original domain Mediavilla.name.
Page size can be reduced by 363.6 kB (42%)
871.6 kB
508.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Mediavilla.name main page is 871.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 453.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 27.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.9 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 15.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mediavilla images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 292.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 292.0 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 28.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mediavilla.name needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 28.6 kB or 78% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (26%)
38
28
The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mediavilla. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
mediavilla.name
361 ms
mediavilla.name
75 ms
jquery-1.9.1.min.js
101 ms
js
57 ms
ga.js
5 ms
MVlogo2013.svg
54 ms
__utm.gif
11 ms
Boxed-Thin-webfont.woff
77 ms
Boxed-Book-webfont.woff
79 ms
common.js
6 ms
map.js
26 ms
util.js
33 ms
onion.js
31 ms
openhand_8_8.cur
103 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
89 ms
stats.js
40 ms
controls.js
35 ms
css
78 ms
transparent.png
36 ms
google4.png
28 ms
mapcnt6.png
51 ms
sv5.png
50 ms
tmapctrl.png
45 ms
tmapctrl4.png
58 ms
google_white5.png
54 ms
vt
90 ms
vt
176 ms
vt
85 ms
vt
107 ms
vt
126 ms
vt
97 ms
vt
139 ms
vt
148 ms
vt
153 ms
vt
167 ms
vt
177 ms
vt
202 ms
vt
204 ms
vt
209 ms
vt
221 ms
CrYjSnGjrRCn0pd9VQsnFOvvDin1pK8aKteLpeZ5c0A.woff
25 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUbO3LdcAZYWl9Si6vvxL-qU.woff
29 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfbO3LdcAZYWl9Si6vvxL-qU.woff
32 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOLO3LdcAZYWl9Si6vvxL-qU.woff
34 ms
AuthenticationService.Authenticate
160 ms
mediavilla.name accessibility score
mediavilla.name best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
mediavilla.name SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mediavilla.name can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mediavilla.name main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
mediavilla.name
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Mediavilla. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: