Report Summary

  • 9

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    23% of other websites

  • 68

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 33% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

mediaxpress.net

You are being redirected...

Page Load Speed

3 sec in total

First Response

53 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

612 ms

mediaxpress.net screenshot

About Website

Visit mediaxpress.net now to see the best up-to-date Mediaxpress content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about mediaxpress.net

Count on high-quality and affordable DVD & CD pressing services when working with Media Xpress. We print, package, and burn your disc in 24-48 hours.

Visit mediaxpress.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Mediaxpress.net page load time and found that the first response time was 53 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

mediaxpress.net performance score

9

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

45/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value25.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.4 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,660 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.36

30/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value43.2 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

mediaxpress.net

53 ms

www.mediaxpress.net

208 ms

calendar.css

15 ms

styles-m.css

46 ms

yttheme.css

67 ms

Our browser made a total of 183 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (155 requests) were addressed to the original Mediaxpress.net, 3% (6 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 2% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) relates to the external source Googletagmanager.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 131.7 kB (3%)

Content Size

5.2 MB

After Optimization

5.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Mediaxpress.net main page is 5.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 112.0 kB

  • Original 135.0 kB
  • After minification 124.5 kB
  • After compression 23.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 112.0 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 11.2 kB

  • Original 4.6 MB
  • After minification 4.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mediaxpress images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.1 kB

  • Original 219.7 kB
  • After minification 219.6 kB
  • After compression 216.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 5.3 kB

  • Original 197.3 kB
  • After minification 197.0 kB
  • After compression 192.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mediaxpress.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 121 (73%)

Requests Now

165

After Optimization

44

The browser has sent 165 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mediaxpress. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 104 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

mediaxpress.net accessibility score

68

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

mediaxpress.net best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

mediaxpress.net SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mediaxpress.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mediaxpress.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Mediaxpress. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: