925 ms in total
109 ms
582 ms
234 ms
Visit medicalhistory.com now to see the best up-to-date Medical History content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about medicalhistory.com
Increasing Physician Productivity with Instant Medical History, Reducing EHR Clicks with medicalhistory.com
Visit medicalhistory.comWe analyzed Medicalhistory.com page load time and found that the first response time was 109 ms and then it took 816 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
medicalhistory.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
51/100
10%
Value9.0 s
1/100
25%
Value7.3 s
29/100
10%
Value8,490 ms
0/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value16.6 s
5/100
10%
109 ms
115 ms
138 ms
127 ms
9 ms
Our browser made a total of 22 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (18 requests) were addressed to the original Medicalhistory.com, 9% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 5% (1 request) were made to Secure.quantserve.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (200 ms) belongs to the original domain Medicalhistory.com.
Page size can be reduced by 16.2 kB (21%)
76.0 kB
59.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Medicalhistory.com main page is 76.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 39.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 5.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 963 B, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 5.9 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 67 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Medical History images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 2.9 kB or 16% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Medicalhistory.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 7.3 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (24%)
21
16
The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Medical History. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.
index.asp
109 ms
mainstsyles.css
115 ms
menustyles.css
138 ms
javascript.js
127 ms
quant.js
9 ms
urchin.js
6 ms
pixel;r=10064455;a=p-461GPqQ7oDAW2;fpan=1;fpa=P0-1375144323-1458275322970;ns=0;ce=1;cm=;je=0;sr=1024x768x32;enc=n;dst=0;et=1458275322969;tzo=-180;ref=;url=http%3A%2F%2Fmedicalhistory.com%2Fhome%2Findex.asp;ogl=
13 ms
__utm.gif
7 ms
bg_main.gif
74 ms
header_main.jpg
111 ms
bg_menu.gif
55 ms
butt_home_sel.gif
63 ms
menu_divider.gif
80 ms
butt_solutions.gif
91 ms
butt_emrs.gif
104 ms
butt_learnmore.gif
110 ms
butt_support.gif
119 ms
butt_company.gif
126 ms
bg_content_container.gif
131 ms
bg_content.jpg
135 ms
01.jpg
159 ms
footer_bg.gif
200 ms
medicalhistory.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
medicalhistory.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
medicalhistory.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Medicalhistory.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Medicalhistory.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
medicalhistory.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Medical History. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: