Tools & Wizards About Us
medifair.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 4

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    20% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

medifair.com

Home | Medi-Fair Home Healthcare Equipment

Page Load Speed

5.4 sec in total

First Response

2.3 sec

Resources Loaded

2.9 sec

Page Rendered

140 ms

medifair.com screenshot

About Website

Visit medifair.com now to see the best up-to-date Medi Fair content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about medifair.com

Description

Visit medifair.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Medifair.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.3 sec and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

medifair.com performance score

4

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

16/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value29.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.8 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,180 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.55

13/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value28.5 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.medifair.com

2335 ms

flatpickr.min.css

29 ms

airbnb.css

34 ms

site.css

85 ms

theme.css

99 ms

Our browser made a total of 19 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 42% of them (8 requests) were addressed to the original Medifair.com, 42% (8 requests) were made to Cdn.vgmforbin.com and 11% (2 requests) were made to Static.hmepowerweb.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Medifair.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.5 MB (64%)

Content Size

3.9 MB

After Optimization

1.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Medifair.com main page is 3.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 3.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 20.8 kB

  • Original 27.3 kB
  • After minification 26.6 kB
  • After compression 6.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 20.8 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 3.2 kB

  • Original 62.3 kB
  • After minification 59.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Medi Fair images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 2.2 MB

  • Original 3.4 MB
  • After minification 3.4 MB
  • After compression 1.3 MB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 2.2 MB or 63% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 279.7 kB

  • Original 333.5 kB
  • After minification 333.5 kB
  • After compression 53.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Medifair.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 279.7 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (78%)

Requests Now

18

After Optimization

4

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 18 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Medi Fair. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.medifair.com

www.medifair.com

2335 ms

flatpickr.min.css

flatpickr.min.css

29 ms

airbnb.css

airbnb.css

34 ms

site.css

site.css

85 ms

theme.css

theme.css

99 ms

flatpickr.min.js

flatpickr.min.js

32 ms

all.min.js

all.min.js

44 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

35 ms

jquery.validate.min.js

jquery.validate.min.js

94 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

32 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

34 ms

typeahead.bundle.min.js

typeahead.bundle.min.js

32 ms

global.js

global.js

296 ms

site.js

site.js

76 ms

site.js

site.js

92 ms

site.js

site.js

76 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

99 ms

bg-core-page-title.jpg

bg-core-page-title.jpg

62 ms

MediFairLogo.png

MediFairLogo.png

63 ms

Accessibility Review

medifair.com accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Best Practices

medifair.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

medifair.com SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Medifair.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Medifair.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

medifair.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Medi Fair. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: