Tools & Wizards About Us
megatam.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 62

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    76% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 78% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

megatam.net

Megatam - App & Software Development: From Concept to Creation

Page Load Speed

3.2 sec in total

First Response

45 ms

Resources Loaded

2.8 sec

Page Rendered

381 ms

megatam.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Megatam content for Israel. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about megatam.net

Specializing in app and software development, we offer comprehensive solutions that transition seamlessly from initial concept and specification to final development, ensuring quality and innovation a...

Visit megatam.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Megatam.net page load time and found that the first response time was 45 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

megatam.net performance score

62

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

67/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.2 s

5/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.6 s

86/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value240 ms

86/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.034

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.1 s

51/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

megatam.net

45 ms

megatam.net

490 ms

css2

38 ms

app.css

418 ms

js

81 ms

Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 60% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Megatam.net, 24% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Megatam.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 110.8 kB (25%)

Content Size

436.3 kB

After Optimization

325.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Megatam.net main page is 436.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 375.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 22.7 kB

  • Original 29.8 kB
  • After minification 25.1 kB
  • After compression 7.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.7 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.7 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 88.1 kB

  • Original 375.4 kB
  • After minification 287.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Megatam needs image optimization as it can save up to 88.1 kB or 23% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 17 B

  • Original 655 B
  • After minification 655 B
  • After compression 638 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 30.4 kB
  • After minification 30.4 kB
  • After compression 30.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Megatam.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (21%)

Requests Now

29

After Optimization

23

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Megatam. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

megatam.net

megatam.net

45 ms

megatam.net

megatam.net

490 ms

css2

css2

38 ms

app.css

app.css

418 ms

js

js

81 ms

css2

css2

59 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

21 ms

jquery-3.5.1.slim.min.js

jquery-3.5.1.slim.min.js

24 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

34 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

43 ms

app.js

app.js

494 ms

Megatam_dark.png

Megatam_dark.png

422 ms

213083030920201012123246310888498.png

213083030920201012123246310888498.png

419 ms

sec-1_1.svg

sec-1_1.svg

432 ms

sec-1_2.svg

sec-1_2.svg

498 ms

sec-1_3.svg

sec-1_3.svg

502 ms

1700544155202010120218291343605521.png

1700544155202010120218291343605521.png

502 ms

710020776202010120243061327337418.png

710020776202010120243061327337418.png

839 ms

1486663486202403171239302109446572.png

1486663486202403171239302109446572.png

838 ms

1428378902202403171236221128632900.png

1428378902202403171236221128632900.png

844 ms

161999950020210914120209373021646.png

161999950020210914120209373021646.png

921 ms

2025206763202010130526342098875381.png

2025206763202010130526342098875381.png

916 ms

29622396220201013050947204933552.png

29622396220201013050947204933552.png

916 ms

6190073320201013050632586201226.png

6190073320201013050632586201226.png

1258 ms

2051960957202010130500431174884371.png

2051960957202010130500431174884371.png

1262 ms

13091407020201013012121122166023.png

13091407020201013012121122166023.png

1277 ms

15087005182020101301200079398395.png

15087005182020101301200079398395.png

1328 ms

396650721202010130119351870044926.png

396650721202010130119351870044926.png

1333 ms

footer-bg.png

footer-bg.png

1340 ms

Megatam_light.png

Megatam_light.png

1674 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHvxo.woff

S6uyw4BMUTPHvxo.woff

41 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USeww.woff

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USeww.woff

45 ms

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30wWA.woff

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30wWA.woff

54 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVeww.woff

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVeww.woff

58 ms

2sDPZGJYnIjSi6H75xkZZE1I0yCmYzzQtmZgEGI.woff

2sDPZGJYnIjSi6H75xkZZE1I0yCmYzzQtmZgEGI.woff

88 ms

2sDPZGJYnIjSi6H75xkZZE1I0yCmYzzQtgFgEGI.woff

2sDPZGJYnIjSi6H75xkZZE1I0yCmYzzQtgFgEGI.woff

89 ms

2sDPZGJYnIjSi6H75xkZZE1I0yCmYzzQtjhgEGI.woff

2sDPZGJYnIjSi6H75xkZZE1I0yCmYzzQtjhgEGI.woff

89 ms

2sDPZGJYnIjSi6H75xkZZE1I0yCmYzzQtuZnEGI.woff

2sDPZGJYnIjSi6H75xkZZE1I0yCmYzzQtuZnEGI.woff

88 ms

2sDPZGJYnIjSi6H75xkZZE1I0yCmYzzQtrhnEGI.woff

2sDPZGJYnIjSi6H75xkZZE1I0yCmYzzQtrhnEGI.woff

57 ms

2sDPZGJYnIjSi6H75xkZZE1I0yCmYzzQtmZnEGI.woff

2sDPZGJYnIjSi6H75xkZZE1I0yCmYzzQtmZnEGI.woff

90 ms

feather-webfont.woff

feather-webfont.woff

1721 ms

xfbml.customerchat.js

xfbml.customerchat.js

31 ms

Accessibility Review

megatam.net accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

megatam.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

megatam.net SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    IW

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Megatam.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Hebrew is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Megatam.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

megatam.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Megatam. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: