Tools & Wizards About Us
mepislovers.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 34

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    54% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 45% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

mepislovers.org

2024 Doublelist Review, Alternatives, Experience - DoULike Blog

Page Load Speed

9.1 sec in total

First Response

39 ms

Resources Loaded

6.9 sec

Page Rendered

2.2 sec

mepislovers.org screenshot

About Website

Welcome to mepislovers.org homepage info - get ready to check Mepislovers best content right away, or after learning these important things about mepislovers.org

I'm sure you have heard of Doublelist, the website that connects people for dating and other activities. It's a modern take on Craigslist personals, and it has become popular because it prov...

Visit mepislovers.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Mepislovers.org page load time and found that the first response time was 39 ms and then it took 9.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

mepislovers.org performance score

34

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

36/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.4 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.9 s

23/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value910 ms

31/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.2 s

25/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

mepislovers.org

39 ms

mepislovers.org

89 ms

article-mepislovers

109 ms

3233 ms

autoptimize_b7e83c6468e971f8d3d9bbd4c3775e8b.css

597 ms

Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Mepislovers.org, 57% (30 requests) were made to Doulike.com and 17% (9 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.2 sec) relates to the external source Doulike.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 417.8 kB (54%)

Content Size

773.6 kB

After Optimization

355.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Mepislovers.org main page is 773.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 446.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 126.3 kB

  • Original 163.8 kB
  • After minification 163.7 kB
  • After compression 37.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 126.3 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 3.1 kB

  • Original 126.4 kB
  • After minification 123.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mepislovers images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 288.3 kB

  • Original 446.8 kB
  • After minification 440.7 kB
  • After compression 158.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 288.3 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 83 B

  • Original 36.6 kB
  • After minification 36.6 kB
  • After compression 36.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mepislovers.org has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (67%)

Requests Now

48

After Optimization

16

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mepislovers. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

mepislovers.org

mepislovers.org

39 ms

mepislovers.org

mepislovers.org

89 ms

article-mepislovers

article-mepislovers

109 ms

3233 ms

autoptimize_b7e83c6468e971f8d3d9bbd4c3775e8b.css

autoptimize_b7e83c6468e971f8d3d9bbd4c3775e8b.css

597 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

1647 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

334 ms

simple-likes-public.js

simple-likes-public.js

303 ms

js

js

49 ms

jquery-ui.js

jquery-ui.js

24 ms

jquery.cookie.min.js

jquery.cookie.min.js

30 ms

lazysizes.min.js

lazysizes.min.js

284 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

1027 ms

index.js

index.js

300 ms

smooth_scroll.min.js

smooth_scroll.min.js

295 ms

js.cookie.min.js

js.cookie.min.js

578 ms

jquery.sticky-kit.min.js

jquery.sticky-kit.min.js

560 ms

front.min.js

front.min.js

595 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

801 ms

plugins.js

plugins.js

1451 ms

main.js

main.js

867 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

894 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

1108 ms

header-desktop.jpg

header-desktop.jpg

473 ms

layzyload.jpg

layzyload.jpg

349 ms

js

js

86 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

47 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

855 ms

likebox.php

likebox.php

211 ms

wp-polyfill-fetch.min.js

wp-polyfill-fetch.min.js

291 ms

wp-polyfill-dom-rect.min.js

wp-polyfill-dom-rect.min.js

290 ms

wp-polyfill-url.min.js

wp-polyfill-url.min.js

687 ms

wp-polyfill-formdata.min.js

wp-polyfill-formdata.min.js

376 ms

wp-polyfill-element-closest.min.js

wp-polyfill-element-closest.min.js

555 ms

wp-polyfill-object-fit.min.js

wp-polyfill-object-fit.min.js

576 ms

collect

collect

173 ms

S5yp7r4Ff9D.css

S5yp7r4Ff9D.css

22 ms

x6r42IOOUZz.js

x6r42IOOUZz.js

27 ms

xjg1QNQguf-.js

xjg1QNQguf-.js

54 ms

O9zq51FKpXz.js

O9zq51FKpXz.js

55 ms

qnn7MVQZYOT.js

qnn7MVQZYOT.js

59 ms

qwSlV7K_jlE.js

qwSlV7K_jlE.js

61 ms

zYzGplAqD4J.js

zYzGplAqD4J.js

60 ms

p55HfXW__mM.js

p55HfXW__mM.js

62 ms

logo-doulike.png

logo-doulike.png

418 ms

300-250-banners-V2-300x250.jpg

300-250-banners-V2-300x250.jpg

598 ms

collect

collect

41 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

122 ms

327358558_479008737774324_6760959327807660598_n.jpg

327358558_479008737774324_6760959327807660598_n.jpg

43 ms

417503323_796993089126637_2671402259536507648_n.jpg

417503323_796993089126637_2671402259536507648_n.jpg

44 ms

UXtr_j2Fwe-.png

UXtr_j2Fwe-.png

11 ms

likebox.php

likebox.php

106 ms

Doublelist_-940x625.jpg

Doublelist_-940x625.jpg

1153 ms

Accessibility Review

mepislovers.org accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

mepislovers.org best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

mepislovers.org SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mepislovers.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mepislovers.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

mepislovers.org

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Mepislovers. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: