Report Summary

  • 21

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    39% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

merrimackvalley.org

The Greater Merrimack Valley | Things To Do, Dining, And More

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

9 ms

Resources Loaded

414 ms

Page Rendered

2.3 sec

merrimackvalley.org screenshot

About Website

Visit merrimackvalley.org now to see the best up-to-date Merrimack Valley content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about merrimackvalley.org

There are so many adventures to take and things to experience in the Merrimack Valley. Learn all the exciting things that our area has to offer.

Visit merrimackvalley.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Merrimackvalley.org page load time and found that the first response time was 9 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

merrimackvalley.org performance score

21

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

61/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value17.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.4 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,540 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value30.2 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

merrimackvalley.org

9 ms

merrimackvalley.org

20 ms

javascript;base64,KGZ1bmN0aW9uKHcsZCxzLGwsaSl7d1tsXT13W2xdfHxbXTt3W2xdLnB1c2goeydndG0uc3RhcnQnOm5ldyBEYXRlKCkuZ2V0VGltZSgpLGV2ZW50OidndG0uanMnfSk7dmFyIGY9ZC5nZXRFbGVtZW50c0J5VGFnTmFtZShzKVswXSxqPWQuY3JlYXRlRWxlbWVudChzKSxkbD1sIT0nZGF0YUxheWVyJz8nJmw9JytsOicnO2ouYXN5bmM9ITA7ai5zcmM9J2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3Lmdvb2dsZXRhZ21hbmFnZXIuY29tL2d0bS5qcz9pZD0nK2krZGw7Zi5wYXJlbnROb2RlLmluc2VydEJlZm9yZShqLGYpfSkod2luZG93LGRvY3VtZW50LCdzY3JpcHQnLCdkYXRhTGF5ZXInLCdHVE0tTUJMWjI0Sycp

2 ms

091a239e8de6ccb7a16a17149c25a007.css

9 ms

jquery.min.js

45 ms

Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Merrimackvalley.org, 7% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to . The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (133 ms) relates to the external source Googletagmanager.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 243.0 kB (5%)

Content Size

5.3 MB

After Optimization

5.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Merrimackvalley.org main page is 5.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 4.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 202.2 kB

  • Original 230.0 kB
  • After minification 197.6 kB
  • After compression 27.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 32.5 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 202.2 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 40.7 kB

  • Original 4.6 MB
  • After minification 4.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Merrimack Valley images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 77 B

  • Original 307.8 kB
  • After minification 307.8 kB
  • After compression 307.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 169.1 kB
  • After minification 169.1 kB
  • After compression 169.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Merrimackvalley.org has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

36

After Optimization

36

The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Merrimack Valley. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

merrimackvalley.org accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

merrimackvalley.org best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

merrimackvalley.org SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Merrimackvalley.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Merrimackvalley.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Merrimack Valley. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: