Report Summary

  • 41

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    60% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

messenger.al

Love Nature – Just another Astra Starter Templates site

Page Load Speed

992 ms in total

First Response

207 ms

Resources Loaded

440 ms

Page Rendered

345 ms

messenger.al screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Messenger content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about messenger.al

Visit messenger.al

Key Findings

We analyzed Messenger.al page load time and found that the first response time was 207 ms and then it took 785 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

messenger.al performance score

41

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

21/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

39/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value18.5 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value920 ms

31/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.004

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.1 s

51/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

messenger.al

207 ms

materialize.min.css

44 ms

icon

39 ms

jquery-2.1.1.min.js

65 ms

materialize.min.js

61 ms

Our browser made a total of 12 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 17% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Messenger.al, 67% (8 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com and 8% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (223 ms) belongs to the original domain Messenger.al.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 171.2 kB (48%)

Content Size

359.3 kB

After Optimization

188.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Messenger.al main page is 359.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 206.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-58%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

  • Original 2.0 kB
  • After minification 1.7 kB
  • After compression 813 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 247 B, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.1 kB or 58% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 45.9 kB

  • Original 206.9 kB
  • After minification 161.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Messenger needs image optimization as it can save up to 45.9 kB or 22% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 124.2 kB

  • Original 150.4 kB
  • After minification 149.2 kB
  • After compression 26.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Messenger.al needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 124.2 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

5

After Optimization

5

The browser has sent 5 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Messenger. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

messenger.al accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

messenger.al best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

messenger.al SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Messenger.al can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Messenger.al main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Messenger. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: