Tools & Wizards About Us
methodstatement.store screenshot

Report Summary

  • 34

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    54% of other websites

  • 99

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 96% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 97

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

methodstatement.store

Method Statement Store - Download Editable Construction Document Files

Page Load Speed

3.9 sec in total

First Response

279 ms

Resources Loaded

3.5 sec

Page Rendered

147 ms

methodstatement.store screenshot

About Website

Welcome to methodstatement.store homepage info - get ready to check Method Statement best content right away, or after learning these important things about methodstatement.store

Now you can download construction method statements, ITP, Checklists and risk assessments in editable .doc and .xls formats. Just add your project name and submit.

Visit methodstatement.store

Key Findings

We analyzed Methodstatement.store page load time and found that the first response time was 279 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

methodstatement.store performance score

34

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

51/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.0 s

13/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.0 s

63/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,710 ms

11/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.019

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.2 s

15/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

methodstatement.store

279 ms

methodstatement.store

1220 ms

twentytwentyfour.css

310 ms

style.min.css

72 ms

script.js

382 ms

Our browser made a total of 24 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 42% of them (10 requests) were addressed to the original Methodstatement.store, 25% (6 requests) were made to C0.wp.com and 8% (2 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Methodstatement.store.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 91.3 kB (16%)

Content Size

575.4 kB

After Optimization

484.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Methodstatement.store main page is 575.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 379.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 89.4 kB

  • Original 111.2 kB
  • After minification 110.4 kB
  • After compression 21.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 89.4 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 379.9 kB
  • After minification 379.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Method Statement images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 1.3 kB

  • Original 60.7 kB
  • After minification 60.7 kB
  • After compression 59.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 594 B

  • Original 23.7 kB
  • After minification 23.7 kB
  • After compression 23.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Methodstatement.store has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (73%)

Requests Now

22

After Optimization

6

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Method Statement. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

methodstatement.store

methodstatement.store

279 ms

methodstatement.store

methodstatement.store

1220 ms

twentytwentyfour.css

twentytwentyfour.css

310 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

72 ms

script.js

script.js

382 ms

styles.css

styles.css

430 ms

frontend.css

frontend.css

439 ms

jetpack.css

jetpack.css

77 ms

interactivity.min.js

interactivity.min.js

71 ms

view.min.js

view.min.js

71 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

76 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

69 ms

js

js

135 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

498 ms

index.js

index.js

458 ms

index.js

index.js

720 ms

frontend.js

frontend.js

557 ms

e-202410.js

e-202410.js

42 ms

cropped-mst-store-logo.png

cropped-mst-store-logo.png

1550 ms

cropped-CIVIL-COPNSTRUCTION-WORK-METHOD-STATEMENT.jpg

cropped-CIVIL-COPNSTRUCTION-WORK-METHOD-STATEMENT.jpg

1169 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

423 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

19 ms

ads

ads

404 ms

ca-pub-4151458158628963

ca-pub-4151458158628963

59 ms

Accessibility Review

methodstatement.store accessibility score

99

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

methodstatement.store best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

methodstatement.store SEO score

97

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Methodstatement.store can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Methodstatement.store main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

methodstatement.store

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Method Statement. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: