2.6 sec in total
302 ms
2.1 sec
175 ms
Welcome to methodtools.com homepage info - get ready to check Methodtools best content right away, or after learning these important things about methodtools.com
Founded in 1974, we are one of the UK’s leading wholesale tooling suppliers working with companies in Stockport, Manchester, Cheshire & across the UK.
Visit methodtools.comWe analyzed Methodtools.com page load time and found that the first response time was 302 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
methodtools.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.6 s
6/100
10%
Value5.8 s
15/100
25%
Value6.5 s
39/100
10%
Value290 ms
80/100
30%
Value0.072
96/100
15%
Value8.4 s
39/100
10%
302 ms
361 ms
172 ms
18 ms
25 ms
Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (66 requests) were addressed to the original Methodtools.com, 6% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Methodtools.wpengine.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (759 ms) belongs to the original domain Methodtools.com.
Page size can be reduced by 131.9 kB (12%)
1.1 MB
942.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Methodtools.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 467.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 82.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 82.4 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 27.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Methodtools images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 12.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 9.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Methodtools.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 53 (76%)
70
17
The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Methodtools. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 26 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
methodtools.com
302 ms
www.methodtools.com
361 ms
style-admin.css
172 ms
css
18 ms
css
25 ms
validationEngine.jquery.css
176 ms
style.min.css
262 ms
styles.css
176 ms
settings.css
178 ms
style.css
176 ms
icons.css
465 ms
style.css
258 ms
style.css
259 ms
woocommerce-layout.css
277 ms
woocommerce.css
289 ms
settings.css
348 ms
css
22 ms
css
22 ms
css
21 ms
colorbox.css
345 ms
default.css
348 ms
style.css
362 ms
all.min.css
424 ms
template.min.css
523 ms
jawmenu.css
438 ms
template-wide.min.css
437 ms
custom-styles-1.min.css
458 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
513 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
520 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
617 ms
hooks.min.js
545 ms
w.js
21 ms
jquery.min.js
577 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
601 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
684 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
647 ms
front-widget.js
646 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
663 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
709 ms
js.cookie.min.js
710 ms
woocommerce.min.js
717 ms
jquery.themepunch.essential.min.js
759 ms
jquery.selectBox.min.js
672 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.min.js
736 ms
jquery.yith-wcwl.min.js
650 ms
index.js
649 ms
index.js
648 ms
sourcebuster.min.js
695 ms
order-attribution.min.js
694 ms
woocompare.min.js
617 ms
jquery.colorbox-min.js
618 ms
all.js
730 ms
app.min.js
632 ms
jquery.validationEngine-en.js
638 ms
jquery.validationEngine.js
621 ms
front-subscribers.js
605 ms
g.gif
15 ms
methodtools-logobig.png
349 ms
methodtools-phone1.png
172 ms
Saw-blade-slide.jpg
346 ms
Router-cutters-slide.jpg
344 ms
planer-blades-slide.jpg
343 ms
Tooling-slide3.jpg
395 ms
Saw-blades-275x390.jpg
345 ms
Machine-knives-275x390.jpg
346 ms
Orange-Tooling-275x391.png
578 ms
Router-cutters-275x390.jpg
394 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf
58 ms
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
16 ms
social_buttons.eot
380 ms
jaw-icon.woff
445 ms
revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js
99 ms
revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js
125 ms
revolution.extension.navigation.min.js
129 ms
loader.gif
89 ms
revicons.woff
89 ms
woocommerce-smallscreen.css
90 ms
methodtools.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
methodtools.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
methodtools.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Methodtools.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Methodtools.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
methodtools.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Methodtools. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: