Report Summary

  • 41

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    60% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 96

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    90% of websites

mevisco.com

Vision Inspection Systems for Quality Control | mevisco

Page Load Speed

6 sec in total

First Response

343 ms

Resources Loaded

5.5 sec

Page Rendered

158 ms

mevisco.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Mevisco content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about mevisco.com

Tailor-made vision inspection solutions for quality control and automation. We support you from planning to integration.

Visit mevisco.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Mevisco.com page load time and found that the first response time was 343 ms and then it took 5.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

mevisco.com performance score

41

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

15/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.2 s

5/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.7 s

16/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value480 ms

60/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.2 s

32/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

mevisco.com

343 ms

701 ms

autoptimize_c3fa0c6db7585f145020268d9879050a.css

753 ms

autoptimize_single_885de4508b677eab89b7f5f6c41331c3.css

320 ms

jquery.min.js

430 ms

Our browser made a total of 17 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (13 requests) were addressed to the original Mevisco.com, 18% (3 requests) were made to Analytics.mevisco.com and 6% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Analytics.mevisco.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 68.0 kB (11%)

Content Size

616.6 kB

After Optimization

548.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Mevisco.com main page is 616.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 221.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 59.0 kB

  • Original 71.6 kB
  • After minification 71.5 kB
  • After compression 12.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 59.0 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.4 kB

  • Original 162.6 kB
  • After minification 160.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mevisco images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 6.0 kB

  • Original 221.0 kB
  • After minification 221.0 kB
  • After compression 215.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 603 B

  • Original 161.4 kB
  • After minification 161.4 kB
  • After compression 160.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mevisco.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (38%)

Requests Now

13

After Optimization

8

The browser has sent 13 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mevisco. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

mevisco.com accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

mevisco.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

mevisco.com SEO score

96

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mevisco.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mevisco.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Mevisco. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: