6.4 sec in total
294 ms
5.8 sec
236 ms
Visit mfaith.com now to see the best up-to-date Mfaith content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about mfaith.com
The domain name mfaith.com is for sale. Make an offer or buy it now at a set price.
Visit mfaith.comWe analyzed Mfaith.com page load time and found that the first response time was 294 ms and then it took 6.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
mfaith.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
65/100
10%
Value2.9 s
79/100
25%
Value2.6 s
97/100
10%
Value120 ms
97/100
30%
Value0.029
100/100
15%
Value3.0 s
95/100
10%
294 ms
24 ms
8 ms
70 ms
371 ms
Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (27 requests) were addressed to the original Mfaith.com, 6% (2 requests) were made to Clksite.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Mm.chitika.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (377 ms) belongs to the original domain Mfaith.com.
Page size can be reduced by 369.1 kB (76%)
485.7 kB
116.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Mfaith.com main page is 485.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 278.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 17.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.6 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 17.3 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 620 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mfaith images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 206.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 206.1 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 145.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mfaith.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 145.1 kB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (88%)
34
4
The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mfaith. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.mfaith.com
294 ms
style.css
24 ms
default.css
8 ms
icomoon.css
70 ms
bootstrap_frontend.min.css
371 ms
jsn-gui-frontend.css
45 ms
front_end.css
43 ms
front_end_responsive.css
55 ms
jquery.js
377 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
104 ms
getads.js
4 ms
banners
80 ms
bootstrap_frontend.min.js
161 ms
scrollReveal.js
142 ms
stellar.js
196 ms
wp-embed.min.js
159 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
252 ms
jsn-fonticomoon.css
138 ms
wallpaper-bg.jpg
17 ms
header-bg.jpg
16 ms
nav-bar-bg.jpg
27 ms
button-bg.jpg
156 ms
cat-bar-bg.jpg
16 ms
rss-cyan.gif
19 ms
rss-orange.gif
26 ms
cancer-reason-290x181.jpg
25 ms
comment-bg.jpg
138 ms
minimall
141 ms
bnr-wrp_1.0.24.js
134 ms
bnr-tag_1.0.9.js
132 ms
banners
136 ms
banners
133 ms
footer-bg.jpg
129 ms
subfooter-bg.jpg
130 ms
minimall
133 ms
mfaith.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
mfaith.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
mfaith.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mfaith.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mfaith.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
mfaith.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Mfaith. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: