Report Summary

  • 49

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    67% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 95

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    90% of websites

mfframes.com

Bespoke Picture Framing, Ipswich | MF Gallery and Framing

Page Load Speed

3.7 sec in total

First Response

238 ms

Resources Loaded

3.2 sec

Page Rendered

275 ms

mfframes.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to mfframes.com homepage info - get ready to check MF Frames best content right away, or after learning these important things about mfframes.com

Based in Ipswich providing comprehensive bespoke picture framing for all types of artwork, needlework and memorabilia.

Visit mfframes.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Mfframes.com page load time and found that the first response time was 238 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

mfframes.com performance score

49

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.3 s

7/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.2 s

20/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value240 ms

86/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.033

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.4 s

59/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

mfframes.com

238 ms

www.mfframes.co.uk

282 ms

mfframes.co.uk

471 ms

style.css

276 ms

style.responsive.css

339 ms

Our browser made a total of 28 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Mfframes.com, 75% (21 requests) were made to Mfframes.co.uk and 7% (2 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) relates to the external source Mfframes.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 396.3 kB (30%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

907.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Mfframes.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 14.8 kB

  • Original 21.1 kB
  • After minification 20.4 kB
  • After compression 6.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 14.8 kB or 70% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 213.6 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 829.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, MF Frames needs image optimization as it can save up to 213.6 kB or 20% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 117.2 kB

  • Original 182.4 kB
  • After minification 153.9 kB
  • After compression 65.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 117.2 kB or 64% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 50.7 kB

  • Original 57.5 kB
  • After minification 44.4 kB
  • After compression 6.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mfframes.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 50.7 kB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (16%)

Requests Now

25

After Optimization

21

The browser has sent 25 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of MF Frames. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

mfframes.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

mfframes.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

mfframes.com SEO score

95

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mfframes.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mfframes.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of MF Frames. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: