2.2 sec in total
102 ms
2 sec
115 ms
Click here to check amazing Mfs Tecnogroup content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about mfs-tecnogroup.com
Visit mfs-tecnogroup.comWe analyzed Mfs-tecnogroup.com page load time and found that the first response time was 102 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
mfs-tecnogroup.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.7 s
61/100
10%
Value7.6 s
4/100
25%
Value13.5 s
2/100
10%
Value16,620 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.005
100/100
15%
Value23.2 s
1/100
10%
102 ms
80 ms
86 ms
90 ms
79 ms
Our browser made a total of 80 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Mfs-tecnogroup.com, 53% (42 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 25% (20 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (889 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 2.7 MB (78%)
3.5 MB
772.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Mfs-tecnogroup.com main page is 3.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 3.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 158.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 158.2 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 163 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mfs Tecnogroup images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2.4 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 2.4 MB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 114.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mfs-tecnogroup.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 114.0 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 54 (73%)
74
20
The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mfs Tecnogroup. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 36 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
mfs-tecnogroup.com
102 ms
www.mfs-tecnogroup.com
80 ms
bt
86 ms
require.min.js
90 ms
main-r.min.js
79 ms
viewer.css
82 ms
UpgradeBrowser.js
84 ms
ugc-viewer
37 ms
dynamicmodel
10 ms
bc3b2e_a54d4fa7b982c93000153c2d2e6fa1ca_178.json.z
362 ms
bc3b2e_1545c252106fb94656a3ee62575aa14a_177.json.z
425 ms
bt
102 ms
skins.min.js
95 ms
components.min.js
41 ms
utils.min.js
90 ms
core.min.js
92 ms
react-with-addons.min.js
89 ms
lodash.min.js
26 ms
TweenMax.min.js
92 ms
layout.min.js
92 ms
tpa.min.js
99 ms
fonts.min.js
94 ms
animations.min.js
94 ms
swfobject.min.js
93 ms
mousetrap.min.js
91 ms
tweenEngine.min.js
91 ms
DrawSVGPlugin.min.js
93 ms
react-dom.min.js
93 ms
ScrollToPlugin.min.js
94 ms
widgets.min.js
93 ms
experiment.js
94 ms
render.min.js
93 ms
wixappsCore.min.js
95 ms
wixappsClassics.min.js
95 ms
wixappsBuilder.min.js
94 ms
zepto.min.js
92 ms
color.min.js
92 ms
react-dom-server.min.js
263 ms
bt
98 ms
latin.css
21 ms
dc.js
43 ms
bt
300 ms
mobileIEFix.css
90 ms
css
87 ms
StripSlideshow.html
102 ms
bc3b2e_9db772811d6548f187becbe7f7663f2e.jpg
427 ms
bc3b2e_e485a2f97f6b4a72aa476c7e3edc7a44.jpg
361 ms
bc3b2e_e2716b4af9e74761b20ff0a2cc323b27.jpg
524 ms
bc3b2e_18ad8d66841b4757be246c98b6360620.jpg
379 ms
bc3b2e_5b8770837160413d98a1ca35289838bf.jpg
668 ms
bc3b2e_4c724f7a755642e4b811c3f3962730d6.jpg
534 ms
bc3b2e_a1fde0d8f2084a54aa64cbb210fc9b0b.jpg
730 ms
bc3b2e_e27903f1faec4c458ecc794c44c3719c.jpg
621 ms
bc3b2e_cc2e829823a04c7f9440c99abafb80c9.jpg
765 ms
bc3b2e_05ebb923078744e083657a3d5956a514.jpg
863 ms
bc3b2e_f20106f934514f2f88eaff7984062940.png
743 ms
bc3b2e_4c1c7fc450cac51343e7fc487b881511.jpg
889 ms
bc3b2e_e8c0f419cf0e696acaffb02b2f0e81de.jpg
885 ms
770afd1fe2d3552b389caf59c7aac5f7.wix_mp
737 ms
71f65917c81585f32982a568c20df3ec.png
738 ms
f4dc48a6e11bf2c9fc09157d1cb50df0.wix_mp
742 ms
9000ff8b0604fd2b56e9db0a4894311b.wix_mp
757 ms
bt
142 ms
bt
142 ms
__utm.gif
123 ms
indented_bg.png
87 ms
shadowbottom.png
98 ms
jquery.min.js
170 ms
jquery.easing-1.3.min.js
97 ms
lodash.min.js
96 ms
webfont.js
183 ms
Wix.js
183 ms
style.min.css
95 ms
app.min.js
94 ms
bt
115 ms
bc176270-17fa-4c78-a343-9fe52824e501.woff
38 ms
c5749443-93da-4592-b794-42f28d62ef72.woff
31 ms
css
79 ms
bc3b2e_7fcb33d4f4224cef8b9f4be419ba29f6.jpg
746 ms
ugc-viewer
37 ms
mfs-tecnogroup.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
mfs-tecnogroup.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
mfs-tecnogroup.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mfs-tecnogroup.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Mfs-tecnogroup.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
mfs-tecnogroup.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Mfs Tecnogroup. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: