Tools & Wizards About Us
mgram.me screenshot

Report Summary

  • 23

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    41% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 91% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 88

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    65% of websites

mgram.me

mgram: free personality test, the 8 characteristics that define your personality, what's special about my personality?

Page Load Speed

3.3 sec in total

First Response

178 ms

Resources Loaded

3.1 sec

Page Rendered

67 ms

mgram.me screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Mgram content for Japan. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about mgram.me

This personality test assesses your personality with just 8 words with surprising accuracy. These simple character keywords help you better understand who you are and what kind of impression you give ...

Visit mgram.me

Key Findings

We analyzed Mgram.me page load time and found that the first response time was 178 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

mgram.me performance score

23

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value75.7 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value76.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value75.7 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,050 ms

25/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value98.8 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

mgram.me

178 ms

267 ms

adsbygoogle.js

73 ms

application-efdbf2cb01a2820b1a6561e68d6670f004a831dfb55ea001d5fef3a8fe34b75c.css

212 ms

all.css

169 ms

Our browser made a total of 16 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 13% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Mgram.me, 31% (5 requests) were made to Assets.mgram.me and 13% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) relates to the external source Assets.mgram.me.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 13.2 MB (76%)

Content Size

17.4 MB

After Optimization

4.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Mgram.me main page is 17.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 16.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 14.6 kB

  • Original 21.6 kB
  • After minification 20.2 kB
  • After compression 7.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 14.6 kB or 68% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 38.7 kB
  • After minification 38.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mgram images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 12.8 MB

  • Original 16.9 MB
  • After minification 16.7 MB
  • After compression 4.1 MB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 12.8 MB or 76% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 383.9 kB

  • Original 446.6 kB
  • After minification 445.0 kB
  • After compression 62.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mgram.me needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 383.9 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (62%)

Requests Now

13

After Optimization

5

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 13 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mgram. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

mgram.me

mgram.me

178 ms

267 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

73 ms

application-efdbf2cb01a2820b1a6561e68d6670f004a831dfb55ea001d5fef3a8fe34b75c.css

application-efdbf2cb01a2820b1a6561e68d6670f004a831dfb55ea001d5fef3a8fe34b75c.css

212 ms

all.css

all.css

169 ms

application-e16d1bb4201ebf813d41db941c948185488d1bbd77a5fec460fc291d113e8ac6.js

application-e16d1bb4201ebf813d41db941c948185488d1bbd77a5fec460fc291d113e8ac6.js

2019 ms

kakao.min.js

kakao.min.js

943 ms

js

js

102 ms

vendor-894100139868111af396aaba7f6107ab351c741dfcb4d66b827d5c9ab7632937.js

vendor-894100139868111af396aaba7f6107ab351c741dfcb4d66b827d5c9ab7632937.js

83 ms

other-f55b7e634808ab2755a07d648c9e126e6f14cdcb9a52eb35269dd4171011032f.js

other-f55b7e634808ab2755a07d648c9e126e6f14cdcb9a52eb35269dd4171011032f.js

217 ms

kakao.min.js

kakao.min.js

95 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

83 ms

4c4134081b55c7ba_3940.js

4c4134081b55c7ba_3940.js

72 ms

mgram_tiles-ea42bad53c904a053fba6ecc96734524a10815f0987ff3614979ef72cdbdf6bc.png

mgram_tiles-ea42bad53c904a053fba6ecc96734524a10815f0987ff3614979ef72cdbdf6bc.png

208 ms

tracking.min.js

tracking.min.js

10 ms

rep

rep

181 ms

Accessibility Review

mgram.me accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

mgram.me best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

mgram.me SEO score

88

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mgram.me can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Mgram.me main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

mgram.me

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Mgram. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: